In my opinion, the evidence of the appearance of the defect at the time of the accident was entirely inadequate to justify an inference of constructive notice. There was no other *Page 479 evidence. The case resembles Burgess v. Plainville,101 Conn. 68, 72, 124 A. 829, Burlant v. Hartford,111 Conn. 36, 149 A. 132, and Anderson v. Bridgeport,111 Conn. 681, 151 A. 188, rather than Linn v. Hartford,135 Conn. 469, 66 A.2d 115. I think there was no error.
In this opinion CORNELL, J., concurred.