[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
It is further the opinion of the court that the services performed by the plaintiff were not subject to the Home Improvement Act.
As such, the defendant has failed to produce this sufficient evidence to show by a clear convincing evidence that the lien is invalid or should be reduced as stipulated by the plaintiff.
BY THE COURT
Gilardi, J. CT Page 11050