The reversible error, if any, would have been the Judge's refusal to exclude the jury on *Page 408 defendant's motion to that effect, if defendant had made one, when the State, in the course of purporting to refresh the memory of the witness began to inquire into matters not otherwise admissible before the jury. But no such motion was made, therefore the point has been properly treated as stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice BROWN, in which I concur with the observations herein made.