I dissented from the opinion of my distinguished brethren in the case of Dupree v. State, supra, because I was then and am now of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to convict. In the instant case, however, although the defendant was generally indicted with J. T. Dupree and Dupree's brother, I do not think that the evidence was sufficient to convict Coney. There are many material differences in the evidence as applied to the defendants, so I concur in the reversal in the instant case.