Denial of a new trial after conviction of assault with intent to murder was not error.
2. The excerpt from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in connection with the other parts of the charge, was not erroneous for any reason assigned.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of assault with intent to murder, and the general grounds are not meritorious.
Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J.,concur.