The letter should be considered as a whole. It first expresses the intention to change the beneficiary. None of the other language is inconsistent with this. I do not agree that it should be interpreted as an assignment of the policy. *Page 469
The letter should be considered as a whole. It first expresses the intention to change the beneficiary. None of the other language is inconsistent with this. I do not agree that it should be interpreted as an assignment of the policy. *Page 469