My views in this case are set forth in the opinion filed on the former submission and which appears in 233 N.W. 118, and to which I still adhere. I think the oral contract between the parties was based upon a good consideration, can be proven by parol, and that it should be carried out, and that the appellee should not be allowed to repudiate it.
I would reverse.
I am authorized to say that Mr. Justice MORLING joins in this dissent.