I subscribe to the decree in this case and to the ruling that the taking out of life insurance is not a donation by the insured to the beneficiary, but I am also firm in the opinion that, according to the ruling in Texada v. Spence, 166 La. 1020,118 So. 120, 62 A.L.R. 281, the relation or status of the insured and the beneficiary named in the policy of insurance was not a state of concubinage, even though the marriage was not valid in this state.