We have lately held in Brooks v. Howard, ante 69, that the statute does not give a review in equity proceedings. The reasons which brought us to that conclusion are equally applicable in the present case, while others have been suggested by Mr. Copeland in argument, which, as it seems to me, do not admit of answer. I am of opinion the case does not come within the meaning and intent of the statute, which gives a review as matter of right.
CUSHING, C. J., concurred.
Motion denied.