Wilday v. Panas

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 34