Conway v. Raphel

The case of United Stores Realty Corporation v. Asea, referred to in the opinion, involves a different phase of the statute of 1919, not controlled by an affirmance in the present case.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 535