The defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion that gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P.2d 1028. On authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed. *Page 711
City of Tacoma v. Heinricy
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Date filed: 1937-05-24
Citations: 68 P.2d 1031, 190 Wash. 710
Copy CitationsLead Opinion