NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 1 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GARFIELD GREENWOOD, No. 14-72731
Petitioner, Agency No. A076-186-391
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 26, 2016**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Garfield Greenwood, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Greenwood’s motion to
reopen as untimely where he filed it three years after the BIA’s final decision, see
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and he failed to demonstrate changed country conditions
in Jamaica to qualify for an exception to the time limitation for motions to reopen,
see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-990 (evidence must be
“qualitatively different” to warrant reopening).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 14-72731