FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 16 2016
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30135
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:06-cr-00030-SEH-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CRAIG WILLIAM FRAZIER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 12, 2016**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Frazier appeals from the district court’s order denying his “Rule 60(b) and
3582 Motion to Reduce Sentence.” Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), Frazier’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Frazier the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental
brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2