DENY; and Opinion Filed August 23, 2016.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-00615-CV
IN RE INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION HOLDING N.V., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06257
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Schenck
Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which it seeks relief from
the trial court’s July 10, 2015 abatement order and the trial court’s March 29, 2016 denial of
relator’s motion to lift abatement. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need
not recount them here.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a);
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
/s/ David Schenck
DAVID SCHENCK
JUSTICE
160615F.P05
2
in Re: International Hospital Corporation Holding N v.
Combined Opinion