\Petitioner"""`
;IN THB
'~H§nynEME-cog »or res nnrrro sTATEs
.* t
vso : - .j. v *\
'rHE' sum oF.,‘rxx-As / * RECEIVEDHN
aeap°ndent‘ jr 1€.53// 3 x COURTOFCRMMNALAP3EALS
,; / ' v _ " ‘. FEB;§;IN§
.f /MGTION T0 AHEND/S"PPLEMENT THE
TEX"AS COURT 0F CRIMINAL APPEAI.S RESPONSH@@HACOSM: Cgem
/
. /
~{
st
ro ran n%§@§kar€ surazur cover JuercEs¢
H f h _ .
Comee@§o§ Naihan Feldor, §ursuant to Suprepo Court Rulqs,'Rulo'
21a ?oqudush novant will show.thé foll,¢m.ings__l ’ ’
_,/ v v ij ' ;' , I n '
Hovant received § response from this court ciérk stat1n3 that
th6 opinion 6nd order must be appendod. 866 Appendix 7.“
Movant did filéd a motion to the trial court and the Taxaa court
,6£ 6riminol appeala, roquéatin3 copiéo of th6 ord6r an opinion 1n’
State Writ # WR 35, 031-0&. See Appondix 8 9.
8he trial court has responded, but has failed to states any _
information whatsoever about the order and.op1nion at_iasue 1n'
WR- 35, 031 04 8tat6 writ. See Appendix 10. ,
The Clerk of th6 Texa6 court of Crimina1 App6al responded and
informed movant where to obtain items requ6ot6d. 866 Appandix.l$.
Movant has mailod 6 letter to the 8tat6 law library. 866 App6pdix
The Judge of vThe. Texaa Court of Crininal Appéala as of this~
writing h66;: rf"-‘"f rulo on thé pendin3 motion presently §>i~¢-
pending bafore that court amisent nwvanc a copy of the order or
opinion in WR-BS 031- 06 St até writ, dnd at the time of f111n3 has
1.`
ha`s responded. 866 Appendix 3.-, 9,15`.` bbvant w`as denied the orderandopmlon. .
3.
Hovant hoo\not received no response from th6 Texas Court of
`:criminal appeals on this motion for tho opinion 6nd ordér of the
WR-SS, 031- 04:State writ fif§§ and denied with out a written crdsr.'
Art. 11 97 section 4. See Appendix s 8, 9, A§ There£ore 1t is$
presently making 1t impossible for me to produce the trial court
end the court 08 criminal appeals opinion and order. Should the
' State law library hav§ the opinion and order et issue concerning»f
Stste writ H8 35 031- 04 order and opinion, et s fee, Movant is §
/@o pay for these documents the clerk of the §
indigent and unable
Supreme Court is rcquesting. In Texes, offenders are allowed to
file a fourth writ. The trial court ordered the ettorney' s to
give an affidavit and the State answered the fourth writ _
WR- 35, 031- 04.' Hovant filed a response. See Appendix' s 2 4, 4- -A. ` y
Movant received no finding of facts and conclusions of law or _
order or opinion. Movant did receive from, The Court `o£ Criminal `
Appeals denied the fourth State writ without s written orderzj x
under article 11. 07 section 4 without an order or opinion. See p£~:§
Appendii A. uovant should not be required to obtain a copy of the§
order or opinion at his expense when all other offenders that y
file second and fourth writ get their °Pini°n end order in the _§
mail free. Shculd any opinion or orders be sent to me, 1 will-
forwarded it to this court clerk. _ ‘ . .
¢Hovant, demonstrate proof.,In th is court, filed a motion for the
tTrial court and the Texas Court of Criminsl Appeals to show causc§
§ for the failure to render an order and opinion in this court,
presently on £ilie and pending, before the court. See Appendix‘ s
2,3, 4, 5 5, 7, 8, 9. See Supreme Court writ with ettached. Appendix's
A, 10, Exhibit 42., '
;\ 1¢ c "- § Re1ief _ _ w
Movant request th.at* this court issue en order for the trial court
and the Texes court of criminal appeals to send this court thev §
opinion and order or send it to the movant pertaining to State
writ # HR~350031 04. Hovant request for an extension of time;»b
based on the evidence before the court ss to why movant can' t
obtain the records that he was instructed to attached to his c',;.
supreme court writ. Hovant has been denied his one chance et a
proper review o£ 'h is claims due to procedural defaulted claim
that usc not addressed et the proper time.
431
1 WHEREFORE, Moveot preye thet the Court grant hie relief or :§- '.
whatever thi§ court deem necessary in the interest of justio§ v:"'
l which moven§ may be entitled. "§
' /@/ emma § Y¢»\/\m
Nethan Fetder 1163298
Ellie Hnit 1697 FH 980
Huntsville, Texae 77343
, _ _ PRO OF OF $ERVICE .…
4j.I, Nethen Felder, do sweet or declare that on this dete, Februery
_\H_, 20l5, ee required by Supreme Court Rule 29, I heve served
¢the enclosedlmotion on eeeh party to the above proceeding, by§
depositing in the United 8tetee mail properly addressed to each
of them end with firet-clees poetage pre-paid by TD€J-ID. the *
names end addresses of thos'e to be served are as followe:'-
District Judge Ron Enns, 715 Dumas Ave. #302 Dumas, Texas 79029;
Court Of Crim1na1 Appeals Judge Keller, 201 W. 14th Street, `“` § .
Austin, Texas 78711 2308. : ;_ y §§ _ §&j ;!:
I, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tree 3 §§
and correet.§ : `, *,, _ »'
'Executed on February, /H.{ 2015.
» m ‘<\\\\v\g'¢\ §'“Y@»\g¢