In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-14-00187-CR
DARRIAN DE’ANTHONY DAVIS-SANDERS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 336th District Court
Fannin County, Texas
Trial Court No. CR-12-24273
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Darrian De’Anthony Davis-Sanders appeals from a judgment that adjudicated him guilty
of delivery of less than one gram of cocaine within a school zone, sentenced him to ten years’
imprisonment, and ordered him to pay $102.00 in restitution. Davis-Sanders has filed a single
brief, in which he raises an issue common to all of his appeals.1 He argues that his counsel rendered
ineffective assistance by failing to question the legality of the search that led police officers to
discover that he was in possession of methamphetamine and a firearm.
We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Davis-Sanders’ appeal in
cause number 06-14-00186-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that Davis-
Sanders has failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in this case.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Ralph K. Burgess
Justice
Date Submitted: July 22, 2015
Date Decided: August 4, 2015
Do Not Publish
1
In our cause numbers 06-14-00186-CR, 06-14-00188-CR, and 06-14-00189-CR, Davis-Sanders also appeals from
(1) a judgment adjudicating him guilty of delivery of less than one gram of cocaine within a school zone, sentencing
him to ten years’ imprisonment, and ordering him to pay $140.00 restitution; (2) a judgment adjudicating him guilty
of possession with intent to deliver four or more grams, but less than 200 grams of cocaine within a school zone,
sentencing him to sixty years’ imprisonment, and ordering him to pay a $1,450.00 fine; and (3) a judgment
adjudicating him guilty of delivery of less than one gram of cocaine within a school zone, sentencing him to ten years’
imprisonment, and ordering him to pay $140.00 in restitution.
2
Darrian De'Anthony Davis-Sanders v. State
Combined Opinion