In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-14-00180-CR
WILLIAM JAMES AKIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 336th District Court
Fannin County, Texas
Trial Court No. CR-13-24796
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
MEMORANDUM OPINION
William James Akin was convicted by a Fannin County jury in this case of indecency with
a child by sexual contact1 and assessed punishment of twenty years’ imprisonment. This case was
tried with three companion cases, which are the subject of other appeals pending before this Court.2
Akin filed a single, consolidated brief covering all four appeals, in which he contends that the trial
court erred (1) in admitting two photographs of adult pornographic websites and two photographs
of internet search history pages, and (2) in granting the State’s challenge of a juror for cause.
The arguments raised in this appeal are based exclusively on the arguments brought before
this Court in the companion appeal styled Akin v. State, cause number 06-14-00178-CR. In our
opinion of this date disposing of that appeal, we found that (1) although the trial court erred, there
was no reversible error in the admission of the complained-of evidence and (2) the trial court did
not abuse its discretion in granting the State’s challenge for cause. For the reasons set forth in that
opinion, we likewise overrule Akin’s points of error as they apply to this appeal.
1
See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11(a)(1), (c)(1) (West 2011).
2
In his companion cause numbers, 06-14-00178, 06-14-00179, and 06-14-00181, Akin appeals from his convictions
of one count of sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child by sexual contact.
2
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Ralph K. Burgess
Justice
Date Submitted: August 10, 2015
Date Decided: September 16, 2015
Do Not Publish
3
William James Akin v. State
Combined Opinion