Jones, Franklin Carl

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2015-07-01
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                            cJlu.Jes..s~~o'~ o/,,f:5           _,\D
                                                                    ",
                                           RECErVED IN
                                                           3
                                      COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

                                            JUt 01 2il15
,-----J~~J11£J~~~~~~--------~Ab~e~IA~co~s~m~.C~Ie~rn~-­
~-~...
\·
·'                             IN 1'HE COURT OF CRUUNAL APPEALS
                                            OF TEXAS

     FRANKLIN CARL JONES                        §                                    RECEIVED IN
           Relator                              §                               COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
                                                §
     vs.                                        §        IN RE. 977894
                                                                                      JUL 0 12U15
                                                §
     BELINDA J. HILL                            §
     IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY                   §
           Respondent                           §                                  Abe! Acosta, Clerk
                           RELATOR'S APPLICATION FOR WRI'r OF f1ANDAMUS

     TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT

           COMES NOW, Franklin Carl Jones, Relator, Pro, se1 in the above styled

     and numbered cause of action and files his Relator's Application of Writ

     of Mandamus, pursuant to Rule 52.08 Section (c) of TRAP, and will show the

     Court the following:

                                                I.
                                             RELATOR

           1.01 Franklin Carl Jones, TDCJ #1224452 1s an offender incarcerated in

     the Texas DeparLment of Criminal Justice and is appearing Pro se, who can be

     located at the William G. McConnell Unit, Bee County, Texas 78102.

           l. 02· Relator has exhausted his reme.dies and has no other adequately

     remedy at law.   I f the court determines that ;:Relator is inti tled to relief

     it must make an appropriate order.     The Court may grant relief without hearing

     oral argument.

           1. 03 The act soughL.tO be compelled is ministerial, not       disc~etionary


     in nature.   ·rRAP Rule 52.8(c) requires Respondent to immediately transmit to

     the Court of 185th a completecopy of his Writ of Habeas Corpus under newly

     discover evidence to hold a competency hearing where the State and Court

     appointed counsel failed to order a competeucy hearing for the Relator

     (Franklin Carl Jones).
\I
·'                                            II.
                                           RESPONDENT

          2.01 Respondent Belinda J. Hill, in her capacity as First Assistant

     District Attorney(of Harris County, Texas has a ministerial Duty to turnover

     The Relator's 11.07 Writ of Habeas Corpus, Memorandum of Law and all his

     Exhibits A,B,C to the Court of the 185th District Court according to the State

     Bar Artiles of V.T.C.A.   ~ov't.   Code Title 2,, Subtitle 6, Appendix Article

     10, Section 9, Code Professional Responsibility. Disciplinarv RUle 9-102(3)

     (4) as applied in Resolution Trust Corp. V.P.C., 128 F.R.D. 647, "underTexas

     Law entire Writ of 11.07 Habeas Corpus and all attachment must be forward

     to the 185th District Court".

                                           III.
             VIOLATION OF STATE BAR ARTICLES OF V.T.C.A. GOV'T CODE TITLE 2
        SUBTITLE 6, APPENDIX ARTICLE 10 SEC. 9 CODE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILI'rY
                              DISCIPLINARY RULE 9-102(3)(4j

          3.01 On f\1arch 9, 2015, the Relator accidently filed an ll.U7 Writ of

     Habeas Corpus, Memorandum of Law and Exhibits A/B,C to First Assistant

     District Attorney Belinda J. Hill, alleging that he was denied a Competency

     Hearing under newly discovered evidence.        Saia writ and documents was filed

     on March 9, 2015, and was recieved by the District Attorney on the 11th or

     12th of March 2015.    The Relator has requested the Respondent to transmit his

     11.07 Writ of Habeas Corpus, Memorandum of Law and all Exhibits to tbe Trial

     Court of 185th District:?''~/~
                                     Time:
                                            -~:--::-----




                                        Applicant's Motion to Compel!

          To The Honorable Judge Susan Br9wn
                                                                                                                                                                                                  0~('[, ,,
                                                                                                                                                                                                       ~ J..,j   "'h
             Fran]clin Carl Jone;:;,              Applicant pro se,                          moves to this court                                                                                      for~       ( 7 0..
          an order
          Hill,    to
          CriminaL


          answer filed and a certificate reciting the date upon whi
          such finding was mad~. in support thereof Applicant wo~l~·
                                                                                                                                                                     .~.;   ·;   ...
          the court the following:
                                                                                                                                                           : ...•·
          1). Applicant filed an application for Writ of                                                                      Habe~s;Corpus
                                                                                                                                                                                       \
          alleging that he was denied . a Competency Hearing und~r pewly
          discovered evidence. Said w~ it was filed on March 9.;, 2b{~:r;·,~nd
                                                                ···: ··'·\;_'·                -· ·,
          was received the District Attorney on the ll th or l2tt;it-i>.:t·:·~.;:t;rd;h
                                                                      .·.~ =:~·i;;;;~;;·J.·~_;:~;:. : -;·_; · -.~
          2015.
          2).   In my haste to mail out my 11.07 writ of Habeas Corpus,
          I addressed it to the District Attorney instead of teh Clerk
          of Courtroom l85th.
          3).   I know that it is not their job to correct my··erro:L 'but·
          I had respectfully asked them to forward my 11.07 writ of Habeas
          Corpus to the proper court, which was the l85th District Court
          so that the Appeal process may be speeded up instead of delayed.
          4). On April 15,2015, approximately (l) month later, Ms. Hill
          has failed to respond to my first letter nor                                                           ~as                        she responded
          to my certified letter,                   which was mailed out cOh.:::·M~r·ch. 26,2015.
                                                                                                       ~- ~-··:.;·.:..\....   :...,~:       ':' ';     :-:     ·.. ~:':~.....
          5). As of this date,                April 15,2015, 30 daysf.·l'a-t'er, Assfstant
          District Attorney,               Belinda J.                  HilL     has         y~::£-.~:·i~ '··~·om~:ly· .. ~:f~h                                                                   Art.
                                                                                              ;.:-          .                                        ...

          11.07 Sec.        3(c).
                                                                                                       ~ .                                                                                  j
             Wherefore,        the Applicant request this Ho'·~,pr.aqle··c