COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS
PP-0226-15
JUN 2 6 2015
COA-07-14-00428-CR
TR.CT-24,202-C Abel Acosta, Clerk
Robert Emmanuel Digman From the 251st District court of
Appellant Randall County, Texas and Seventh
The State of Texas, Appellee District Court of Appeals, Amarillo
Texas
Pro Se Motion requesting a rehearing and a EN BANC RECONSIDERATION
IN THE
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
AUSTIN TEXAS
To the honorable Justices fo the above said court:
Coe now, the appellant int eh above styled and numbered cause and
respectfully moves this honorable court to grant appellant a rehearing and a
EN BANC reconsideration and in support there of would show the court the
fol lowi rTg: " ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ "
The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request, are as follows:
Appellant Request Robert Digman
Oral argument 1854737
NealUnit
9055 Spur 591
Amarillo Texas 79107
FILED IN
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
June
JUN 26,
26 2015
2015
Abel Acosta, Clerk
It was proven my trial ended with constitutional error that caused harm to my
constitutional rights and also my 6th and 14th amendment. My trial was only 4:42,
Four hours and forty two minutes long, the DA reserved 3 days. She violated my
right of due process before my trial ever began and did it again in her closing
statement. It was proven my trial was unfair, all Iwant is a fair trial. Idon't
understand how you as a highest court Justices can say a 4 hour and 42 minute
trial only half was unfair with constitutional error and the other half was a fair
trial. Iquestioned the trial courts' jurisdiction and received no answers on that,
was my PDR ever read? If Randall county has so much evidence against me they
will not have any problem giving me a fair trial WITH OUT ERROR, HALF of4:42 is
only 2:21 two hours and twenty one minutes. They reserved 3 days, the DA even
has to apologize to the Judge for the mistakes, how many mistakes are they
allowed to make? Ionly was allowed one. The DA is is on her 4th. NO ONE ever
asked if I did what Iwas accused of! My trial was done as whole, NOT two parts.
Please tell me how only 72 half was infected? Was the first two hours fair or was
the last 2 hours fair and only the 42 minutes not fair? Or was it the other way, the
2 hours not fair and the last 2:42 fair? If the DA used all 3 days, first day pick jury,
~2wd dayTpro'secute cbluTTtT^ifd ^
34 was fair and Vi was not fair.
See TRAP 68.1 Generally
On petition by any party the court of criminal appeals may review a court of
appeals decision in a criminal case.
See TRAP rule 74
Please accept TRAP 9,3(B) to suspend copy rule
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
For the reasons stated above, it is respectfully submitted that the Court of
Criminal Appeals of Texas should grant this motion for reconsideration.
All I want is a fair trial in whole.
Respectfully submitted
Robert Digman #1854737
Neal Unit
9055 Spur 591
Amarillo Texas 79107
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned Appellant/Petitioner hereby certifies that a true and correct
copy of the foregoing motion has been mailed; U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the
office ofthe Criminal District Attorney for Randall County, 2309 Russell Long Blvd
Suite 120, Canyon Texas 79015, and to the State Prosecuting Attorney, P.O. Box
12405, Austin, Texas 78711, on this the ^ *T day of May, 2015
Petitioner Pro Se TDCJ # 1854737
%C~:(5~
coo* oU'MU IA/*"* °f**«s
L^jg (
,..,ll,|,l..i„.|.„p.-u.PM.Ml'i'l11ni"ii,ili")ll1,i,1i
"?&? I^ :l S2SOB