ACCEPTED
05-14-00191-CR
FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS
DALLAS, TEXAS
5/13/2015 10:54:13 AM
Dallas County
LISA MATZ
CLERK
Public Defender’s Office
FILED IN
5th COURT OF APPEALS
DALLAS, TEXAS
5/13/2015 10:54:13 AM
May 12, 2015 LISA MATZ
Clerk
Lisa Matz, Clerk
Fifth Court of Appeals
600 Commerce Street, Suite 200
Dallas, Texas 75202
Re: Certification of Compliance with Rule 48.4
Russell Starks v. The State of Texas
Trial Court Case No. F13-32480-K
Appellate Court Case No. 05-14-00191-CR
Dear Ms. Matz:
Pursuant to Rule 48.4, of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I certify that a copy
of the opinion and judgment in the above styled and numbered cause was sent, certified mail,
return receipt requested, to the Appellant at his last known address. I further certify that,
along with the opinion and judgment, a letter was included in which the Appellant was
advised that I intend to file a Petition for Discretionary Review on his behalf.
Respectfully,
/s/ Kathleen A. Walsh
Kathleen A. Walsh
Assistant Public Defender
enclosure: certified mail return receipt
cc: G. Brian Garrison, Assistant District Attorney
133 N. Riverfront Blvd., 9th Floor, LB 2 Dallas Texas 75207-4313 Phone: (214) 653-3550 Fax: (214) 653-3539
II Complete i!omsl, 2. and 3, Also complete
item 4 if .Restricted Delive!Y'ls desired. c ~
II Print your liame and address on the reverse o Addressee
so that we can return the card to you. C •.Qate of Delivery
• Attach this card to the back of thg'imailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
J ~ 8"-/..)
O. IsdeliveryJddress different from item 11 0 Yes
\t:);;~\1dt3-\-ox ~S . If YES, enter delivery address below: . 0 No
\DC-:S ~O\q\\Y{3 \
Pr\ly -ed \J \'l i-\-
3. SelJliite1Yfje
1.-\ D \ \=VV\ '3loq W.Of\n EJ'Certffied Mail€! D Priority Mail Express'"
o
T D-NQ~O('L ;I)C.1 (Dj{j o
Registered
Insured Mail
D Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Collect on Delivery
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
--~~~--~----------~----~~
2. Article Number 7013 2250 0002 2038 8629
(Transferfrom servie' ~j,
, PSForm3811,July2013 Domestic Return Receipt
~ 0'\
'."
Russell Starks v. State
Combined Opinion