ACCEPTED
07-15-00281-CV
SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS
AMARILLO, TEXAS
7/28/2015 10:25:47 AM
Vivian Long, Clerk
NO. 07-15-00281-CV
IN THE TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT
FILED IN
AMARILLO, TEXAS 7th COURT OF APPEALS
AMARILLO, TEXAS
7/28/2015 10:25:47 AM
* * * * * VIVIAN LONG
CLERK
IN RE: GUIDEONE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
PETITIONER
* * * * *
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the 99th Judicial District Court
Lubbock County, Texas
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE REAL PARTIES IN INTERESTS’ RESPONSE TO PETITION
FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
* * * * *
THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT:
COME NOW Real Parties in Interest, Steven Biasatti and Paul Gross d/b/a
TopDog Properties (“TopDog”), and respectfully present this unopposed motion
requesting that the time for filing TopDog’s response to the Petition for Writ of
Mandamus be extended seven (7) days, from July 30, 2015 to August 6, 2015. In
support of this motion, TopDog would show the Court as follows:
1. This motion is being filed prior to the time TopDog’s response to the
petition is due.
2. This original proceeding involves request for mandamus review of a
trial court order signed on July 6, 2015.
3. On July 20, 2015, the Court issued a request for a response to the
Petition for Writ of Mandamus setting the deadline for filing the response on July 30,
2015.
4. TopDog requests the Court extend the deadline for the response to the
petition to August 6, 2015, because of scheduling conflicts for TopDog’s appellate
counsel under the current deadline of July 30, 2015.
5. Lead appellate counsel for TopDog, Brendan K. McBride, had
previously scheduled deadlines in other appeals that have required his immediate
attention since the Court’s order requesting a response was issued on July 20, 2015.
Specifically, counsel had to finalize and file a Motion for Rehearing En Banc in a
complicated and technical products liability appeal pending in the Fourth Court of
Appeals as Cause No. 04-14-00562-CV, De Los Santos v. Ford Motor Co., which was due
on July 22, 2015. In addition, counsel is currently preparing a Petition for Permissive
Interlocutory Appeal for filing in the Fifth Court of Appeals, which is currently also
due to be filed by July 30, 2015. TopDog respectfully request an additional seven day
extension of the current deadline to file a response to the petition in this original
proceeding to ensure that their lead appellate counsel has an adequate opportunity to
thoroughly review the record and brief the issues raised in the petition for this Court’s
consideration.
2
6. This is the first extension TopDog has requested in this original
proceeding.
7. This extension is not requested for any purpose of delay, but so that
justice may be done.
8. Certificate of Conference: Counsel for Real Parties in Interest
conferred with Robert Gilbreath, appellate counsel for Petitioner, regarding the relief
requested in this motion via telephone on July 28, 2015. After conferring, the parties
agreed that this motion could be presented to the Court as UNOPPOSED.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/Brendan K. McBride/s/
Brendan K. McBride
State Bar No. 24008900
Brendan.mcbride@att.net
THE MCBRIDE LAW FIRM
OF COUNSEL TO GRAVELY & PEARSON, LLP
425 Soledad, Suite 620
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(210) 472-1111 Telephone
(210) 881-6752 Facsimile
And
Matthew R. Pearson
State Bar No. 00788173
mpearson@gplawfirm.com
GRAVELY & PEARSON, L.L.P.
425 Soledad, Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(210) 472-1111 Telephone
(210) 472-1110 Facsimile
3
COUNSEL FOR REAL PARTIES IN
INTEREST, STEVEN BIASATTI and
PAUL GROSS d/b/a TOPDOG
PROPERTIES
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been
forwarded on this 28th day of July, 2015 to:
Mr. Robert Gilbreath
Hawkins, Parnell, Thackston & Young, LLP
Appellate counsel for Petitioner, GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company
Via electronic service through Texas.gov.
/s/Brendan K. McBride/s/
Brendan K. McBride
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that this brief is in compliance with the rules governing the length
of briefs prepared by electronic means. The brief was prepared using Microsoft Word
2010. Garamond 14 pt. font was used for the body, and Garamond 12 pt. font was used
for footnotes. According to the software used to prepare this brief, the total word
count, including footnotes, but not including those sections excluded by rule, is 404.
____________________________________
Brendan K. McBride
4
in Re GuideOne National Insurance Company
Combined Opinion