RECEIVED
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS |
v' HOUSTON, TEXAS FILED IN
JUL 2 4 Z015
PD-0948-15 1ST COURT OF APPEALS
HOUSTON. TEXAS
CHRISTOPHER A. PRIME
CLERK *l
--,— TLidl^otfrt Case No. 1363644
BRIAN VICTORIAN The 182nd DISTRICT COURT
appellant HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,
FILED IN
THE STATE OF TEXAS §§ no. 0l-l3-eW4pICRIMINALAPPEALS
appellee
JUL 27 2015
Absl Acosts Ciprk
APPELLANT SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME '
Accordingingly, RULE 63.2 (c), The Court of Criminal Appeals
may extend the time to file a petition for discretionary review if
to.
a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5 (b;* no later than
15 days after the last day for filing the petition. The Court of
Criminal Appeals may extend the time to file a response or reply
if a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) either before
or after the response or reply is due.
Issues the Court of Criminal Appeals should consider:
• Appellant has NO brief from his appellant attorney in order to
file an appropriate PDR.
• Appellant is not an attorney and is completely ignorant of the
law -and understands "ignorance is no excuse'" however, appellant
has psychological issues that renders him more than a lament to
the law.
• Appellant is depending on the help from total strangers in prison
wtfbm may or may not truly understand the fine workings of the law.
Appellant begs these Court to extend his time to the maximugi
GQUBTQFCMNA1
JUL WSfi
Ab8l/to08ta,Cterk
amount of time allowed to file his briefs.The additional time is
truly needed to aquire needed records and to file. This request
is not designed to harass or cause unnecessary delay in the proceedings
Accordingly, Appellant respectfully request a full fourty-five
days after the July 30 extension, to draft and file the appropriate
response.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct under
the penalty of purjury.
Victor^an#l^
Stiles Unit
3060 Route 3514
Beaumont, Texas 77705
Victorian, Brian
Combined Opinion