GeoTag, Inc. v. Lawrence P. Howorth

CHIEF JUSTICE LISA MATZ CAROLYN WRIGHT CLERK OF THE COURT (214) 712-3450 JUSTICES theclerk@5th.txcourts.gov DAVID L. BRIDGES MOLLY FRANCIS GAYLE HUMPA DOUGLAS S. LANG BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS (214) 712-3434 Court of Appeals ROBERT M. FILLMORE gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov LANA MYERS DAVID EVANS DAVID LEWIS Fifth District of Texas at Dallas FACSIMILE (214) 745-1083 ADA BROWN 600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200 CRAIG STODDART INTERNET BILL WHITEHILL DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/5THCOA.ASPX DAVID J. SCHENCK (214) 712-3400 September 22, 2015 Mr. Thomas Clark Ms. Jill Malouf Clark, Malouf & White, L.L.P. 12222 Merit Drive, Suite 340 Dallas, Texas 75251 RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05-15-00916-CV Trial Court Case Number: DC-15-04034 Style: GeoTag, Inc. v. Lawrence P. Howorth Dear Counsel: The Court has reviewed the clerk’s record and has a question concerning our jurisdiction over the appeal. Specifically, there does not appear to be an appealable order. This Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and those interlocutory orders specifically authorized by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that disposes of all parties and all claims. See id. Appellant is appealing the trial court’s order granting a motion to compel arbitration. A party may appeal an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 171.098(a)(1) (West 2011). There is no statutory authority for appealing an order granting a motion to compel arbitration. See Brooks v. Pep Boys Automotive Supercenters, 104 S.W.3d 656, 660 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.). So that this Court can determine its jurisdiction over the appeal, appellant is requested to file, by OCTOBER 2, 2015, a letter brief of no more than 3 pages explaining how this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Appellee may file a responsive letter brief of no more than 3 pages within 10 days of appellant’s brief. No extension of time will be granted. If either party will be relying on information not in the record before this Court, that party must obtain a supplemental clerk’s record from the trial court containing that information. We suspend the current deadline for appellant’s brief on the merits. After it has received briefs regarding the jurisdictional issue, the Court will either: (1) dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction; or (2) notify the parties by letter that the Court appears to have jurisdiction over the appeal and of the new deadline for appellant’s brief. We caution appellant that failure to file a jurisdictional brief by OCTOBER 2, 2015, may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. Respectfully, /s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court cc: Mr. William Dunn Dunn Sheehan, LLP 3400 Carlisle St., Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75204 LM/rz 2