<7ESUs Court of CAt mik/vl appeals octobcr tg, ooi5 Honorable 1\&k a*d ^useces w.iiaMK. Wekk, A^a^t P. 0, Box (23og, CAfrroL StatioM T^'uP,*0'VIZ£Z-,t Aus-nKhXfexAs 78111 R^ea/^x'Hoo RE' Willed K, We4)i) VS. THt ST7VTE d>F T^X/V5 Harris £oun4y, TeX• RECEIVED IN beW -Hus tWiLble &,*+. XW been ftJ3POT|^^re- Htmc^>te Ji^e Homely Hb\l ef-B>e IllUt £>is+r^ &>wc\ -Pnrf* Ujlrvido rwy CcfWl^sH** o^cvurtA^ He -Pdu/vJ /V\y5e4-F mcL^enV be*©**-, dujrvn^ fiL^v4 a-f-Ver 4no4, a^J 4oir purpose &f afpeaJ-, M.y i*d^c*tt.y Ortijctu^ Fy&s tte>4- cha*ide Si^ce {ncedccejfoJrloh \v\ fVie Vt>.C3^X.D - „x_ uexd"ii\*e*rb +d <£r\y CouH- u>i'B* JuttscIic^tov -te> \feri-ry *\y Gci^-W oac| Su?or^ sfeferview-f/^o^ X a*vi iVtiijeKt, * "TXls (e*W i5 a rexju£%+ -fcr a^oopy of +fce le#a$ (W+ of (l*W»va4 A-ppe^Js OPlAflDfJ ark* ORDERS -fro™ A*y 3>in^ AppeaJ by way o-E-fae Appalan^ "D»SG*rn&A W fi€VieW +M- U)&$ £»led aWl decided py erfSatdi OPi^tOfX SmeereW M/,wlc8 WfUanl K.\AleM>,*l7l3IZo
Webb, Willard K.
Combined Opinion