RECEIVED .'N
94 1 l _ l COURT OF CH!MINAL APPEALS
d@;£m\oe.(\"\ 1396
§§
L9j((j/7U/ . 02 103
353 18 2015
v Aam_ ALOSTA mem » Ab@'Acosta,crc-.»rk
COU\?.T_D_P_CR;£N_\_H_)._ A.AW_ 9 `
§ 9 Q>E>_\L___\§_§_‘D :8_ _C,A?I¥:\L$ $‘\~q¥\`er\
Au$%:r\ 'Tua,< *1<37\\
y …_\§e.”-__l\,£\»e Qe';, Am\~\o,~l\/
C,CA !\lo \_/\[R~ bj,&n _‘ O\`;~Oa 0\'\{\;()"\
.`_T_V_c\`Q-_\__CQQH Cc\<@ »>\0.&#\51% ~ A z -'@M§ ~c
bear "(V\~r‘ M§e,\ A<,os\c~,
I' \)Jc,\r\\’ ‘\O '\'\nq`,r\\'_a“\\_.>;°\) per '\~\§\2, \¢\Q,\O cd\r\
\n£v)/ N\¢C\Mer\ \`pg“__§fov\&v,¢>a_ _C__x~¢\€» fd_l§{.\o\~)_\§‘,&t>\§ ) `I.
C,DN\€. "'D \lbu \\va QQ'\' 0¥ m§€/ £/._b§.g."c~§?;\.of\-
`S, c~w\ oJ\ `<\d_`\ e,_¢>.\_'__\.o`>.(t¢_\w\m\/v_.;,. _~_I_§zr :__.\.\.r~.>'\:.\'€c\
3 l 1
Q(:Q.PD.S.€>_\L>.\&..X'AW \'\\Q.Co\m lru~/\Q,
9 1 am unob\e. ’\'o ct,\¢\
..4._.¢
CL\_€_Q\, A;_~O`€ 651 ‘_5\;0\§;\€ fm_\ 6c
£GF m\l S\'\'\j¢\*'\nf\ l
1 \A) ___O\>.__C_o c\v\ `<.i\ e,c\_ao€__a.(§g:)£¢¢v_€\ \e._c§,__\lo!>\o._ex \'_._.:X \J\€.
64__0\;\_¢,.._.\/;1_\:\\'\.\!.\&\¢\ saw ecq\o\ e._mé;r&~;m u>. <\Q<\_‘Q_ c\\r~ X° ¥\r\e, ~\r\`\@\\ ¢mr¥ g;1;~>1`
_C_€;=S_€.£A;L\_<;z\_:} 1 l'\'/ e Cr\ c\.\:>_bs¢_<);¢_»_c_e_§)_`\\_<>_g__*i\g,__mr§ :\A cére_
mg m,\\ §§ 4\,\¢, "c)§>;~a;o.\»" 5%4:0,\ 04 44\:3 mur¥$'
44“,1;,\35 4\\&44 \4,444, 4\\b MO;,\AQ4Q, :_ \-WL \,`M\U'_\;¢Q(\
¥\rm x\\qr~\s m aueg¥ m\. ' `
_\`\r\e, ~\-<\§q\ mur\ r\‘A r\oJY e\A\\e/re, '\~0 5\-\¢\0, @x¥\` diem
- w 444c mwm¢ m 45 954~'\~@44 nw 1454 404 MM.4
~\'\r\e, b(`bd mu<\\, w\~\(\\ `\Q/\¢\_`_\\_'C_B_(__w\q _~_c>__r_\___‘\`p._\;£_,._ CDHS:c\eNr\
\)b. "\')f\© \ul`u, 1 su\ocv\ "\-\el\ mq ‘cu\\ araumu\'\' w\\'\,\ my
\o::) “\'0 $Jnm~\t“\' \r\ (`,CI\ ms \/~IP~ b"l é>\]__ Ar\¢\ ‘\' was
C\e/n\-QA/
4{\(`€, '\`\\er€, dn\ll. dv€n¢cx csc (`e,\le:€ o_\vq:\c;\">\¢.’\~o Mé
lp_"' 43sz M§ r\+?~,
`\ouf lr‘\~\_e ml oj_‘rg>ic_w_`~`s__@£e.q¥r_\>/_QH no reAcAa(\ ¢) v\
`\"\\S N\o;"~'\?.(`.
3\ \\GP,<`€,\L `J',.
A£/V\=_€S'/
A~mo N\l )v\AkE$ ;HSSO&%
¥Q(`a\_;‘><-m(\ \)r\:\' y
d
\o\\ac> 555)%@\{3
N\ 3me “<\;, 752522\
.'o©
TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
Alistin, Texas
4 MANDATE
§_ §"_THE sTATE oF TEXAS §
§ roer 3111) I)ISTRICT CoURT oF ANDERsoN CoUNTY _ GRI;ETINGS
Before our COURT O_F CRIMINAL APPEAL'S, 011 MAY 19, ZQI(), the cause upon an Application for
tXirit of Habeas Corpus styled: §_ l b § §
_ EX PAR'I`E ANTHONY MARES
_CCRA No. AP'-'§7§6,219
Tr. Crt No. 24__5__73- B _
Was determined; and therein our said COURT OF CR§IMINAL APPEALS made its order 111 these Words:
“This cause came on to be heard on the Application f01 W§r1t of Habeas Corpus, and the same being
considered, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IS
GRANTED, in accordance With the Opinion of this Court, and that this Decision be certified below for3
9
Observance."
WHEREFORE, We command you to observe the order of our said CO§URT OF CRIMINAL
mr M 5 § ' 1 1 ;~ .;.4: ' § " 14 §
_ WITNESS, THE HoNoRABLE sHARoN KELLER_, Pre§siding Judge{ y
` . of Our said Co_URT oF CRIM_INAL APPE~ALS, o
with the Seal thereof annexed at the City of Austin,
onr\tbis dd¥/ June 14-, 2010.
`1 *1 ,P A§i_zsoN, c1erk § /
, §Chief Deputy Clerk
9
5
, 1 The withheld evidence does not exonerate applicant of his participation in the robbery,’ but
had the state timely disclosed Yao’s statements,'as -required'by- Brady, the statements coul'd`have
., § . s y .
b
been used by the defense to p%rsuade -the_j;lry that/applicant was not the shooter. ln light of all the
‘.
w
evidence,l including the highly favorable disposition of Whitlock’s charges, the§absence o"f the
withheld evidence undermines confidence,in the jury’s determination of punishment Because
criminal trials are bifurcated, we may grant rie_lief._b‘y§ord§ering'either a new trial or a new hearing on
§ §§ punishment only. Ex parte }1’1`[!§,'52~8"8'.`\/‘§\/".~2<1'12‘5‘,'"127(Tex.\'Cri`rn".~*/X*pp?€""§l"@?§)`.‘"'We grant applicant
l
relief in part and remand the case to the trial court for a new punishment hearing x
,Deli'§ver@d; May 19, 2610
Do not publish