In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-16-00261-CV
____________________
$4,300.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY (DAVID EARL STANLEY), Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 258th District Court
Polk County, Texas
Trial Cause No. CIV27,223
________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellant, David Earl Stanley, filed a suggestion of mootness because
the trial court signed an order of non-suit for the civil forfeiture proceeding. The
State did not contest the suggestion of mootness. The appeal is dismissed as moot
without reference to the merits. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________
LEANNE JOHNSON
Justice
1
Submitted on September 28, 2016
Opinion Delivered September 29, 2016
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
2
$4,300.00 in U.S. Currency (David Earl Stanley) v. State
Combined Opinion