In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-15-00305-CV
IN RE EDWARD JAYCOX, RELATOR
Original Proceeding
October 26, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Relator, Edward Jaycox, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. By letter dated
August 28, 2015, Jaycox was notified that the filing fee of $145 had not been paid. This
letter notified Jaycox that he could either pay this fee or file an affidavit of indigence by
September 8 to prevent dismissal of the original proceeding. Jaycox was further
advised by this letter that, if he filed an affidavit of indigence, he must also file an
affidavit relating to previous filings and a certified copy of his inmate trust account. On
September 8, this Court received correspondence from Jaycox that includes a
document that substantially complies with the requirements of an affidavit of indigence
and a certified copy of his inmate trust account. However, this correspondence did not
include an affidavit relating to previous filings. As such, by letter dated September 11,
this Court again expressly notified Jaycox that he must “file an affidavit relating to
previous filings that complies with Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section
14.004(a)(1), which requires an inmate who files an affidavit of inability to pay costs to
identify “each action, other than an action under the Family Code, previously brought by
the person and in which the person was not represented by an attorney, without regard
to whether the person was an inmate at the time the action was brought . . . .” TEX. CIV.
PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.004(a)(1) (West Supp. 2014). This letter informed Jaycox
that failure to file the required affidavit relating to previous filings by October 1 will result
in dismissal of this original proceeding. Despite two notices expressly advising Jaycox
of his duty to file an affidavit relating to previous filings and a reasonable time in which
to comply with this Court's request, Jaycox has failed to pay the filing fee.
Consequently, Jaycox’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.
Mackey K. Hancock
Justice
2