'_|Ll ij UZ`O§)O(/r&_ MR. JASON T. PEGUES #728196 HUNTSVILLE UNIT 815 12th STREET HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 77348 JULY 15,2015 TO: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CLERK OF THE COURT: ABEL ACOSTA P.O. BOX 12308 CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 Re: EX parte JASON TYRQNE PEGUES V. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN REFERENCE TO CAUSE No.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HCA [WR-7h,762-03....WR-74,762-04....WR-7h,762-05]. DEAR CLERK OF THE COURT: ENCLOSED IS A COPY OF A MOTION THAT WAS FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT IN REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED CAUSE NUMBERS AND WRITS. IF YOU WILL PLEASE FILE THIS IN THE COURT SO THAT IT MAY BE TAKEN INTO_ CONSIDERATION UPON HEARING AND RULING, I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ASSISTANCE. SPECTFUL SUBMITTED, j ~#L%§? AsoN/TYRoNB?PEGUES #72§?%6 APPLIcANT. cc/file: RE©ElVED EN ©QUHT OF CRHVHNN_ APPEALS JUL 1 7 2015 Ab@iAcoSia,C¥@ré< 1 of 1 No.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC& wR-7a’762_03 ¢ c c owR-74,762_0L}¢ o o ¢wR_74,762-05 NOTICE TO THIS HONORABLE COURT Ex PARTE Jason T. Pegues MW’W!WSMW’W’W$W’ THE FOLLOWING IS TO INFORM THIS HONORABLE COURT THAT A MOTION HAS BEEN FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT, AND THAT THE APPLICANT HAS SENT A COPY TO THIS HONORABLE COURT. IN SUPPORT OF SUCH MOTION SEE: Ex parte PoNl),ais s.w.ad 94 n`.13 (TEx.cRIM.APP.zois)= Best practices include filing all materials with the Trial Court before the Trial Judge has signed his Findings of Fact and made his Recommendation to this court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from amending or supplementing his materials even after application is forwarded to this court, as long as those materials are filed in the Trial Court. SPECTFU AsoN/T. T>EGFES #728196 CC/FILE: APPLICANT: m Nq.94~§cn-ozs1as 903 and 9a-nca¢026185'ncq § § IN THE zanth DIsTthT conard §§ . § hx Parte Jaaon TYRQNE PEGUES § - - g oF § § “ '§ pont BEND co uNTY, TExAs Applicant’s Motion Requesting The Court To Hold HCB and HCA For 30 Days so Applicant Can Supplement and Amend The Applications Comes now, Jason Tyrona Pegues_#728196, Applicant, Fro-se, in the above styled and numbered cause of acti.on respectfully' file this Motion Requesting The Court To Hold 9A- DCR 026185 H03 and HCé so the 'Applicant CannSupplement Amend the Applications due to the reconsideration of 95-003-026185 HCS and 9&-DCR¥026185 HCA by this court based on the perjury made by attorney Cary M.Faden in his first' _affidavit that was attached to and refera1:cad in the State’s earlier response to beth third and fourth writs of habeas corpus. The applicant would also like to show this chorable Court the following: PROCEDURAL HISTORY 'Applicant filed his initial application ll.O? (HCZ) around Eehrua£zw lGLZOIG and on Au§ust_ 27, _201&, the €ourt of criminal Appeals -¢~.__- denied the writ without written order. On December lO, 201&, applicant -.¢.»---._¢_--~~._-,_--u_¢- vfiled a cch se scant application ll.. 07 (HCA)[wR 76,?62- -OA] and on ' §§£g§mél§Ol§ the Court OF Criminal Appeals Dismidsed the application without written order, in Which this court reconsidered (HC&) and on gune_;g¢ggl§, the court of criminai Appeais Dismissed aca = Best practices include filing all materials with the Trial.Court before the Trial Judge has signed his vFindings of Fact and made his Recommendation to this Court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from amending or supplementing his materials even after Application is forwarded to this Court,as long as those materials are filed in the Trial Court. The applicant also request that the applicant be appointed to counsel based on the fncts, the record, surfacing the many unresolved issues in the current proceedings of this case £§l§§. With the _)s` z 1$'! .-_,; 1 epnlicant being Pro-se and laymen of the law, there are some filings that can be filed unknown to the applicant which could assis£ bin in these proceedings or harm him . Upon being appointed counsel}'the applicant request that the appointed counsel do not file anythiné until the applicant and the appointed counsel have discussed all:: area's of the proceedings, asking this Honorable Ccurt to order tne appointed counsel to show proof that the applicant and appointed cpunsel have done as such. lastly, the applicant request anLive Evidentinry Hearing based on v; an the credibility of all those who have responded to the habeas corpus :proceedings as well as the DNA ?esting Motion Investigaxion that is ‘~¢ currently active in this case.estmorney Cary M.Faden was very aware of what the BNA test results were because ne was the one who cross“ examined the crime lab ciiminalist Monies Thompson. The bottom line is than if the applicant would not have filed a Motion For Fcrensic DNA Testing, attorney Cary M.Faden's perjury would not have possibly ever came to light. So the question is what other lies have been told and how long have these false end slandering ssaiements been stated. \") Out cf all these proceedings, the appli ant only request for a New Punis`nmen.t‘Hearing. Hozqe