Texas Court of Criminal Appeals cn//PTnc r-JZt
P.O. Box 12308
Austin, Texas 78711 SEP 0 8 2015
"In re Eric Flores , pro se relator" AbSiAcOSfc
General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr.,
El Paso Texas 79910
"In re The State of Texas , relator"
vs.
Former Texas Governor Rick James Perry , respondant
Trial Court Case No. D-l-DC-14-100139
Third Court of Appeals Case No.3-15-00063-CR
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Case No.PD-1067-15
JUDICIAL NOTICE OF LEAVE OF TEXAS CRIMINAL COURT OF
APPEALS BEFORE JUDGEMENT IS ENTERED TO PROCEED
INFORMA PAUPERIS TO FILE PETITION FOR AMINUS CARIAE
BRIEF IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure no. 72 the pro se relator
Eric Flores hereby gives judicial notice of leave of Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals before judgement is entered in this case for the
purpose of proceeding informa pauperis on appeal to file "Petition for
Aminus Cariae Brief in the United States Supreme Court because the
circumstance of this case have so far departed from the normal course of
judicial process so as to invoke the judicial power of the United States
Supreme Court in the public interest of health and safety. In support
thereof the relator states the following grounds for relief , in particular 5
STANDARD OF REVIEW
To proceeding informa pauperis on appeal before a judgement is entered
by the lower court of appeals of last resort the relator must show that
he is economical eligible and establish good faith by showing that the
relator is contending arguableing legal points on their merits to state a
claim upon which relief maybe granted on appeal.
In this particular case , the relator has attached a application to
proceed informa pauperis to file petition for aminus cariae brief without
having to pay for the fileing fees due to the relators economic
indigencies.
I.Relators Economic Indigencies
The application to proceed informa pauperis decloses the relators
financial abilities which amounts to the value of zero due to
unemployement because employers will not hire relator due to his
criminal history.
The application to proceed informa pauperis that discloses the relators
financial abihties can be constituted as a financial statement to proof
that the relator is economically indigent to qualify to proceed informa
puaperis on appeal to file petition for aminus cariae brief without
having to prepay fileing fees in the United States Supreme Court before
judgement is entered in the lower court of appeals of last resort because
the circumstances of this case regarding the defendants character of
engageing in conduct that constitutes a threat of imminent danger such
as death to the members of the public in general are of imperative
importance to the public interest of health and safety.
II.Relators Good Faith on Appeal
The relators instant appeal is in the public interest of health and safety
because it is requesting that the United States Supreme Court to use its
judicial power to prohibit the defendant from engageing in conduct that
constitutes a threat of imminent danger such as death to the members
of the public at large.
The relator has previously appealed to complain that the defendant was
engageing in conduct that constitutes a threat to the public interest of
health and safety by randomly killing more than four members of the
pubhc at large to include the relators brother Javier Flores Junior
Uncle Jorge Salas , Aunt Mary Salas , Great Aunt Connie Salas ,
Grandmother Evagelina Salas Mendoza , Grandfather Marciano Flores ,
and Aunt Mary Elene Salas which constitutes premeditated capital
mass murder in the first degree.
The relators previous appeal specifically identified the defendant as a
members of an organized group of executive employees of the federal
government whom was engageing in conduct that constitutes a threat of
imminent danger such as death to the members of the public in general.
The relators previous appeal specifically requested that the United
States Supreme Court to use its judicial power to prevent the
defendants from engageing in negligent torturious conduct that
constitutes a threat of imminent danger such as death to the members
of the pubhc in general.
The United States Supreme Court denied the relators appeal and
refused to use its judicial power to prohibit the defendant from
engageing in negligent torturious conduct that constitutes a threat o
imminent danger such as death to the members of the pubhc to include
using deadly technology to torture to death the relator or his immediate
relatives.
As a result the defendant retaliated against the relator for previously
appealing to the United States Supreme Court by continueing to engage
in negligent torturious conduct that constitutes a threat of imminent
danger such as death resulting in the death of a large number of the
members of the pubHc in general constituteing premeditated capital
mass murder in the first degree.
Whereby the defendant retaliated against the invocation of the relators
constitutional rights by engaging in negligent torturious conduct such
as using advanced technology with a direct signal to the satellite in
outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a genetic code to
profoundly disrupt the personality and senses of a person named Adam
Lanza for long durations exceeding calendar days in which was
equivalent in intensity to take physical control of Adma Lanza mental
state of mind so as to compel Adma Lanza into an act of dures by a
calculated procedure to use a weapon such as a gun to shoot and kill
twenty children at Sandy Hook elementary in NewTown Connecticut
constituted mass murder in the first degree.
The State of Texas empaneled a state grand jury to indict the defendant
on the criminal charge of abuse of power.
The relator then filed a motion for joinder of criminal offenses to
prosecute the defendant for engageing in negligent torturious conduct
that has resulted in the death of more than four members of the public
constituteing mass murder in the first degree.
The defendant appealed the criminal indictment to the Third Court of
Appeals in Austin Texas stating that he did not abuse his power.
The relator then filed a petition for aminus cariae brief in the Third
Court of Appeals requesting that the intermeditate court of appeals to
enforce the law by issueing a final judgement on appeal to instruct the
lower district court to criminally prosecute the defendant for
continuesly engageing in negligent torturious conduct that has resulted
in the death of more than four members of the public constituteing
mass murder in the first degree.
The Third Court of Appeals upheld the criminal charge of abuse of
power against the defendant whom shall be tried in the lower district
court for the allegedly committing the offense of abuse of power but
refused to use its judicial power to prohibit the defendant from further
engageing in negligent torturious conduct that has resulted in the death
of more than four members of the public constituteing mass murder in
the first degree.
As a result the defendant further retaliated against the invocation of
the relators constitutional rights to file nonfrivolous legal claims
challengeing a constitutional deprivation of life or liberty in the Third
Court of Appeals , by using advanced technology with a direct signal to
the satellite in outerspace that has the capability of calculateing a
genetic code to profoundly disrupt the personality and senses of a
person named David Conley for long durations exceeding calendar days
in which was equivalent in intensity to take physical control of David
Conley mental state of mind so as to compel David Conley into an act of
dures by a calculated procedure to use a weapon such as a gun to shoot
and kill a family of six children , husband , and wife in which directly
reflect the number of children in the relators family tree because the
relators family consisted of six children , mother , and father in which
was solely conspired so as to indirectly communicate threats to cause
the death of the relators and his immediate relatives.
The relator then reported the defendants negligent torturious conduct
that resulted in the death of a whole family in Houston Texas to the
Houston District Attorneys Office in Texas.
The defendant then further retaliated against the invocation of the
relators constitutional rights to notify the Houston District Attorney
Office of the defendants negligent torturious conduct that has resulted
in the death of a whole family , by using advanced technology with a
direct signal to the satelhte in outerspace that has the capability of
calculateing a genetic code profoundly disrupt the personality and
senses of a person named Shannon Miles for long durations exceeding
calendar days in which was equivalent in intensity to take physical
control of Shannon Miles mental state of mind so as to compel Shannon
Miles into an act of dures by a calculated procedure to shoot and kill a
Harris County Sheriff Deputy named Darren Gorforth in Houston
Texas for assisting in a criminal investigation involveing the defendants
negligent torturious conduct that has resulted in the death of more than
four members of the public constituteing mass murder in the first
degree.
The defendant then filed an appeal in the Texas Criminal Court of
Appeals of last resort in which was contending the legality of the
criminal charge of abuse of power that was upheld by the lower Third
Court of Appeals.
If the defendant loses the appeal in the Texas Criminal Court of
Appeals of last resort, the defendant has the substantial likelihood of
continueing to engage in negligent torturious conduct that will result in
the death of more members of the public as the defendant has
previously done after the lower Third Court of Appeals rendered a
judgement refuseing to dismiss the criminal charge of abuse of power
against the defendant.
The relator then filed a petition for aminus caraie brief in the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals seeking to invoke its judicial power to
prohibit the defendant or other participates from the public from
engageing in negligent torturious conduct that has already resulted in
the death of more than four members of the public to include the
relators immediate relatives.
The clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals named Adam Smith
refused to file the relators petition for aminus cariae brief so that the
appellate panel will not review or consider the relators nonfrivolous
legal claims seeking to invoke the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
judicial power to prohibit the defendant from further engageing in
neghgent torturious conduct that has already resulted in the death of
more than four members of the public constituteing mass murder in the
first degree.
Because the defendant has the substantial likelihood of continueing to
engage in negligent torturious conduct that can potentially result in the
death of more members of the public at large in the instant that the
defendant were to lose his appeal in the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals therefore the relator appeals to the United States Supreme
Court 0 seek to invoke its judicial power to prohibit the defendant from
further engageing in negligent torturious conduct that can potentially
result in the death of more members of the pubhc to include the relator
and his immediate relatives.
Without the United States Supreme Court judicial power to maintain
order and restore discipline amongst members of our American society ,
the defendant has the substantial likelihood to continue to engage in
negligent torturious conduct that constitutes a threat of imminent
danger such as death to members of the public in general.
To the extent that the defendant character conduct to engage in
negligent torturious conduct that has resulted in the death of more than
four members of the public without being liable or held accountable by
criminal prosecution because of the United States Supreme Courts
refusal to use judicial power to maintain order and restore discipline
amongst members of our American society inwhich has influenced or
even encouraged other members of the public to participate in
engageing in negligent torturious conduct that constitutes a threat to
the public interest of health and safety.
By the United States Supreme Court refusal to enforce the law to
maintain order and restore discipline amongst members of our
American society, will eventually create a trend of influenceing or
encourageing others members of the public to believe that they will not
be criminally prosecuted for also participateing in engageing in
negligent torturious conduct that constitutes a threat of imminent
danger such as death to the members of the public in general in which
will produce an organization of members of the public that are out of
control, violent, and hostile with the substantial likelihood of causeing
the death of more members of the public in general.
Therefore it suffice to state that the circumstances of this case
sufficiently establish to be seeking relief from the defendants negligent
torturious conduct that has resulted in the death of several members of
the public in which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the
circumstances of this case have so far departed from the normal course
of judicial process of the court system so as to invoke the judicial power
of the United States Supreme Court in the public interest of health and
safety.
For the reason that the circumstances of this case do demonstrate to be
of imperative importance to the public interest of health and safety
therefore the relators will continueing to appeal to seek for the United
States Supreme Court to use its judicial power to prohibit the defendant
and those members of the public that have been influenced or encourage
to participate in engageing in negligent torturious conduct that
constitutes a threat of imminent danger such as death to the members
of the pubhc in general.
Thus , the relator has estabhshed good faith on appeal in the pubhc
interest of health and safety to be eligible to proceed informs pauperis
on appeal to file the petition for aminus cariae brief in the United
States Supreme Court before judgement is entered in the lower court of
appeals of last resort without having to prepay the fileing fees because
of the relators economical indigencies.
CONCLUSSION AND PRAYER
Wherefore Primises Considered in conformance with the prerequisites
settforth herein because the relator has shown that he is economically
eligible to proceed informa pauperis and established good faith with
arguable legal points on their merits in the public interest of health and
safety therefore it is necessary for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
to not only grant the relator permission to proceed informa pauperis on
appeal to protect the public interest of health and safety but also the
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals should certify to the United States
Supreme Court to determine whether the defendants is engageing in
conduct that is a threat to the public interest of health and safety so as
to bring merit to the relators appeal.
The defendants conduct to randomly cause the death of members of the
public every time the defendant loses an appeal in this criminal case
does establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the circumstances
of this case have so far departed from the normal course of judicial
process so as to justify invokeing the United States Supreme Courts
supervisory power because the case is of imperative importance to the
pubhc interest of health and safety.
The relator prays for general relief.
re Eric Flores^ro se relator"
General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr.,
El Paso Texas 79910
Pursuant to Penalty of Perjury (28 U.S.C & 1746) the relator hereby
states , declares , and certifies that the foregoing application to
individual Chief Justice Roberts is true and correct.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to Penalty of Perjury (28 U.S.C. & 1746) the relator hereby
states , declares , and certifies that true and correct copies of the
foregoing judicial notice of leave of court of appeals of last resort was
sent via United States Postal Services to the following parties of
interest settforth below , in particular i
(i)Eric Flores is a party of interest whoms place of business is
designated at General Delivery , 8401 Boeing Dr., El Paso Texas 79910.
(ii)Richard James "Rick" Perry is a party of interest whoms place of
business is designated at 122 C St., NW, Ste. 200Washington, DC 20001.
(iii)The State of Texas is a party of interest whoms place of business is
designated at State Capitol, P.O. Box 12697 Room IE.8 Austin Texas
78701