Dewberry, Stedmon

<63 ~o~·_.o\
I
Ex Parte Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

From Bowie County
DATE: _01~ 25 1 {
STEDMON MONTREL DEWBERRY
(Name of Applicant) 5th District Court FILE IN WRIT FILE
51
1 SUPPLEMENTAL BY:..... (JqL
TRIAL COURT WRIT NO. 11F0763-005-A
CLERK'S SUMMARY SHEET

APPLICANT'S NAME: STEDMON MONTREL DEWBERRY
(As reflected in judgment)

OFFENSE: MURDER
(As reflected in judgment)

CAUSE NO. : 11F0763-005
(As reflected in judgment)

PLEA: GUILTY I !NOT GUILTVI I NOLO CONTENDERE (CIRCLE ONE)

SENTENCE: 50 YEARS TDC
(Terms of years reflected in final judgment)

TRIAL DATE: 1110312011
--~~------------------------------------------------
(Date upon which sentence was imposed)

JUDGE'S NAME: RALPH BURGESS
(Judge presiding at trial)

APPEAL NO.: 06-12-00025-CR
(If applicable)

CITATION TO OPINION: -S.W.2d-
(lf applicable)
RECEIVED IN
HEARING HELD: X YES NO COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
(Pertaining to the application for writ of habeas corpus)
SEP 212015
FINDINGS & CONCULSION FILED: YES X NO
(Pertaining to the application for writ of habeas co-rpus)
Abet Acosta, Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: GRANT DENY X NONE
(Trial court's recommendation regarding application for writ of habeas corpus)

JUDGE'S NAME: BILL MILLER This document contains some
Uudgepresidingov_e_r_h_a-be_a_s_c_o-rp_u_s_p-ro-c-ee_d_i-ng-)--------------------~p=a=g=e=s~tn=a=t~a~reofpoorquali~
at the time of imaging.
 INDEX

1. COURT'S DOCKET 1

2. DOCKET SHEET 10

3. SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW 12

4. ORDER SETIING HEARING 29

5. ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING 30

6. RECEIPT OF EXHIBITS 32

7. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 33

8. CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 35
 5TH DISTRICT CouRT

CASE SUMMARY
CASE No. 11F0763-005
The State of Texas vs Stedmon Montrel Dewberry § Location: 5th District Court
§ Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K
§ Filed on: 09/22/2011
§ Legacy Track Number: 181691
§ Prosecutor Control Number: 11-02814
§

CASE INFORMATION

Offense Deg Date Case Type: Adult Felony
I. MURDER Fl 08/28/2010
TRN: 9028106804 TRS: DOOI
Filed As: MURDER Fl 9/21/2011
Arrest: 08/29/20 I 0

Statistical Closures
11103/2011 NGP/J VERDICT

Warrants
Capias - DEWBERRY, STEDMON MONTREL
11/03/2011 !2:00AM Recalled
09/30/2011 12:00 AM Received
09/30/2011 12:00 AM ACTIVE WARRANT
09/30/2011 12:00 AM ACTIVE WARRANT
09/23/2011 12:00 AM Issued
Fine: $0 Bond: $0
Notes: 11103/2011 Issuing Department: TTPD
11/03/2011 By MPARKER from SHERIFF: RECALLED PER
STEVE GRAHAM
09/30/2011 Warrant Location: SO
09/30/2011 By MPARKER from SHERIFF: TI0-07276 FILED:
DEWBERRY, STEDMON MONTREL
09/30/2011 Warrant Location: B
09/30/2011 NCIC Entered: C
09/30/2011 NCIC Entered: B
09/30/2011 State Entered 09-30-2011
09/30/2011 State Cleared 11-03-2011
09/30/2011 Indictment Number: IIF0763-005 Indictment Date:
09-22-2011

DATE CASE ASSIGNMENT

Current Case Assignment
Case Number IIF0763-005
Court 5th District Court
Date Assigned 09/22/2011
Judicial Officer Burgess, Ralph K

PARTY INFORMATION
Lead Attorneys
State STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant ~DEWBERRY, STEDMON MONTREL HENRY, CRAIG L
Retained
903-792-4645(W)

DATE EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT INDEX

09/22/2011 $FILE (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: $FILE Memo: Automatic File Date Event

PAGE I OF9 Printed on 09/1 6itoJ 5 at I 0:56AM
 5TH DISTRICT COURT

CASE SUMMARY
CASE No. 11F0763-005
09/22/2011 QJ COURT DOCKET (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: COUD

09/22/2011 ~Filed by Indictment (OCA)
Event Code: IND

09/23/2011 ~CAPIAS ISSUED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K).
Event Code: KPS

09/27/2011 Pre-Trial Reset
Event Code: PRTR Memo: 10131@ 1:30? NB

09/27/2011 Pre-Trial Reset
Event Code: PRTR Memo: 10/4@ 1:30? NB

09/28/2011 ~ Order to Appear
Event Code: OA

09/28/2011 ~APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

09/28/2011 ~Issue
Event Code: ISS

09/28/2011 ~ Order to Appear
Event Code: OA

09/29/2011 QJ Issue
Event Code: ISS

09/29/2011 QJ APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/03/2011 QJ SUBPOENA RETURN SERVED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: SRS

I 0/04/2011 QJ Order to Appear
Event Code: OA

10/04/2011 PRE-TRIAL FINAL/RESET (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: PF Memo: 10/25

10/07/2011 ~APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/07/2011 QJ Issue
Event Code: ISS

I 0/07/2011 ~APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/07/2011 ~Issue
Event Code: ISS

PAGE20F9 Printed on 09/16lzo 15 at 10:56 AM
 5TH DISTRICT COURT

CASE SUMMARY I
CASE No. 11F0763-005

10/07/2011 qj APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/07/2011 qj Issue
Event Code: ISS

10/12/2011 qj APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/12/2011 QJ Issue
Event Code: ISS

10/12/2011 ~APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/12/2011 ~Issue
Event Code: ISS

10/12/2011 ~APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/12/2011 ~Issue
Event Code: ISS

10/12/2011 c:iJ SUBPOENA RETURN SERVED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: SRS

10/12/2011 c:iJ APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/12/2011 c:iJ Issue
Event Code: ISS

10112/2011 c:iJ APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/12/2011 qj Issue
Event Code: ISS

10112/2011 {ij APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10112/2011 QJ Issue
Event Code: ISS

10112/2011 qj APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/12/2011 ~Issue
Event Code: ISS

PAGE30F9 Printed on 09/16dOJ5 at 10:56 AM
 5TH DISTRICT COURT

CASE SUMMARY
CASE No. 11F0763-005

I 0/17/2011 qJ APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10117/2011 qJ SUBPOENA RETURN SERVED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: SRS

10/17/2011 qJ SUBPOENA RETURN SERVED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: SRS

10118/2011 Q:J Issue
Event Code: ISS

10/19/2011 ~NOTICE (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: NOTICE Memo: EXPERTS

10119/2011 ~STATES NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE EXTRENOUS OFFENSES (Judicial Officer:
Burgess, Ralph K )
Event Code: NO/

10/21/2011 ~APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/2112011 ~Issue
Event Code: ISS

10/21/2011 ~APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP

10/21/2011 ~Issue
Event Code: ISS

10/21/2011 gJ BENCH WARRANT ISSUED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: BENCH

10/21/2011 gJ STATES WITNESS LIST (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K )
Event Code: SLOW

10/25/2011 gJ APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: APPLISUBP Memo: DEFENDANT

I 0/25/2011 gJ ISS SUBPOENA(S) (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: /SS/SUBP

I 0/25/2011 TRIAL DATE SET (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K )
Event Code: TRIAL Memo: 1111 @ 9A NB

10/26/2011 g:j Order to Appear
Event Code: OA

10/31/2011 g:j MOTION IN LIMINE (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: MOT/IN/LIM

PAGE40F9 Printed on 09/16)}015 at I 0:56AM
 5TH DISTRICT COURT

CASE SUMMARY
CASE No.llF0763-005

10/31/2011 qj MOTION IN LIMINE (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: MOT/IN/LIM

10/31/2011 qj SUBPOENA RETURN SERVED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: SRS

10/3112011 qj SUBPOENA RETURN SERVED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: SRS

11/01/201 I qj ELECTION/PUNISHMENT BY THE JURY (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: ELECTION

1110112011 Jury Sworn (OCA) (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: ]/SWORN

11/01/201 I JURY VOIR DIRE (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: ]/VOIR DIRE

I 11011201 I [j JURY PANEL LIST (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: JPL

I 1/011201 I [j JURORS SELECTED (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: JUS

11/01/2011 [j JURY SHUFFLE- I ST (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K )
Event Code: lSI

11103/201 I ~CHARGE ON PUNISHMENT (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: PUNISHMENT!CH

I 1/03/201 I ~CHARGE OF THE COURT (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: ]/CHARGE

11103/201 1 ~RECEIPT OF EXHIBITS (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: REE Memo: TRIAL EXHIBITS

11103/2011
~Disposition (Judicial Officer: Burgess,
Ralph K)
Coni Type: TDC (TEXAS DEPT CORRECTIONS) Coni Length: 50Yrs Sentence Date: Nov 3
201112:00AM To Commence: Nov 3 201112:00AM Reporter: JR (lANA ATCHISON
RUSHING) Jury Trial: Yes
I. MURDER
Not Guilty

I 1/03/2011 Sentence (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
I. MURDER
Adult Sentence
Confinement to Commence I 1103/20 II
50 Years, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Criminal Justice

11118/201 I qj ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF WITNESS EXPENSES
11130/201 I CJIS FORM (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: CJIS

PAGE 5 OF 9 Printed on 09/16~015 at 10:56 AM
 5TH DISTRICT COURT

CASE SUMMARY
CASE No.llF0763-005

11130/2011 {ij LETTER COMMITMENT PAPERS (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: LTRICP

12/0112011 ~MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: MOINW/JRL

01/30/2012 Notice of Appeal
Transcript Due: Mar 2 2012 12:00AM Motion New Trial: Dec 1 201112:00AM Notice of
Apppeal: Jan 30 2012 12:00AM Attorney: M.MOWLA (MICHAEL MOWLA) Active: No

01130/2012 {icl Notice of Appeal
0113112012 CIDAICRICOA (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: CDACRCOA

01131/2012 ~ORDER FOR ATTORNEY WITHDRAW (Judicial Officer: Burgess, Ralph K)
Event Code: OGA W

01131/2012 c~-
/o '2-4 I! 1 ,...-:_" .
f7Y'A...-C...
.d
rrc- '
r¥7:.-p LL-
TT'--~..,
'

II
1
I
1
11
1
r4oc-7; c~ R-~--~ ~-..b.~------·· ·---
/ ~w~~:>~_,;
--=-..:....//~~-~~11_~!?~ cx~~;7--0~-- ~~~~..;-..4
1

1
AryzU~ /J~ ~- 7~} Pie~ ~ ~..
1
o~
~
>~~~7 : s-~.J~~ /~ et./~:
-()-_,
1
51~ ,Re.sf.-~ · c~ Re <-" ~-::_~__&._ ~ /) ~/·
10

'
 .
~

• 5u District Court
COURT DOCKET
.
DATE OF ORDERS
! ~!ONTH DATE YEAR I------------------- ORDERS OF THE COURT-----------------------
I
I
JJ ~ II I Re.. -.- -L rV/-:J:. b...J--- #.._ ,~$~ £'?,.... ... /;._ C/y_!Y;
1
, II

/J -/a r •.!~ ~~ .$ .!--'.,L s~.J ~~~~--R c#A- _. ,
:~---,.

!
S:l- -~ ~si-J ..-.1 dc,:9-.J.; ~~G-- . ..1
, . ,•
cA-cA~ k-.t' ~ #-c. ~~, 1 ~ ,........._9
,
r ,,.11.....
- r ~_:_
,
'f~ B~'!J~ A ~",J~~
, , • V...-~:....,£ foe~• ~·
/
I '
1>-t.
.... .
~-.,. .,......
r-- _4 ~~
- ,.
,
~ 1"~ />~ r::--( '%..~st
.
A~r-1 v~·~ , 6. V~4 ~~v-..1'· ,
p~~~ ~ p{...:-. ..... , • s~ S; P --~'s L. ~ ... ...c. c...__.,
$~ /.). .. ,...,., , t> -,.A. ~. ~s p~~ .... ~ C'~·
,. __
~b-
_, r

s~ C/lfp.s:---f· d~LA.q,..e_
. ....t.-. •• /
,. ,
r-- a."'V(~ ~--~ ~ ~ :f'~
, , ; c/--. ""
-
.
.1{
.J'_., --,r _e.A.
,
•
- ,
A..-~ ~)
- F - ---.r -,~ :r~- /)4!~-~ - t>-¢J~....J7>~4f.! _.,
tk~~ A_.q_-la. d
-7
1 s-o l('f!>~.S
,
rAe:.. ~J.Ia

F1~;
1/~!...f;
, T.-.
.v~~ ~<_~~~-,.
.0. ~
-:Ia.
r- _.4 1\
,-
....._
A-(.$ 4-.....b~~~- ~
w~· ..,._ -r__
~-,- ~-r
-
-
/
s;.,t_ -.,..._.,~. ~--"_/& c: .. ~ fo- 12L... $•· ~
J-
-..,.
,. .
r ~ p _ .. - - --,
,- --L-
,

~~ /.bC)
,fa h'c:> ,. , CT$; : - ---- 4 :;J_, -
_._- ~A
--, ... ,z
q II IY, lr/4-~ /J t&./ ~ /'-C.d'r"-__....
~ ~-- ..,__ A_.- ~o 1. _/ .,_
,.~-,....-.;::
~
./ #

-"7'"~,_4
/
q II 15"'" ~t'.. ... (~/... ,/} 0 -- __,_ 4J!l Altfl!f ~~ lt'H f....Jt-1..
6
~.L .IW~t- ~ m,l...../2
D
,

11
 BRODEN, MICKELSEN
HELMS & SNIPES LLP
FILED FOR RECORfi
2015 JUN 26 PM J: OS
*Board Certified, Criminal Law· Texas Board of Legal Specialization
*Board Certified, Criminal Appellate Law· Texas Board of Legal Spectali' ·
A team approach to criminal defense
F. Clinton Broden*
Mick Mickelsen• Michael Snipes

June 24, 2015

Bowie County District Clerk
710 James Bowie Drive
New Boston, Texas 75570-3512

Dear District Clerk:

Please find the original Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of
Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. P. Art. 11.07.

I have also enclosed, along with a self-addressed, stamped envelope, one extra
copy of each for file stamping.

If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact us at the number
below. Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Enclosures (2)
Cc w/ Enclosure: Bowie County District Attorney's Office
710 James Bowie Drive
New Boston, Texas 75570-3512

2600 State Street • Dallas, Texas 75204 • Tel. (214) 720-9552 • Fax (214) 720·9594
www.DallasCriminaiLawyers.com
 No. 11F0763-005-A r:·ILEO FOR RECORU
201~ JUN 26 PH J: 05
EXPARTE ) 5th DISTRICT COURT
)
___________________
STEDMON DEWBERRY
)
) BOWIE COUNTY, TEXA

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO TEX.
CODE CRIM. P. ART.ll.07

I. INTRODUCTION

As noted in Stedmond Dewberry's Memorandum of Law in Support of

Application for Writ ofHabeas Corpus Pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. P. Art. 11.07, the

sole focus of the trial in this case was the question of who shot, Latasha Antwine.

Was it Mr. Dewberry, as repeatedly argued by the State, or was it Brioni Dansby or

Brandon Antwine?

In his Application, Mr. Dewberry argued, inter. alia, that he was denied

effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to consult with, retain

and call as a witness a ballistics expert. Indeed, Mr. Dewberry's trial counsel had

submitted an affidavit stating that the only reason he did not retain a ballistics expert

was because of cost. See Attachment 1. 1

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held several times

1
The Court of Criminal Appeals has made clear that an attorney can be found to be
ineffective when he declines to hire an expert for economic reasons even if that attorney is
retained. See, e.g., Ex Parte Briggs, 187 S.W.3d 458 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

13
that it can constitute deficient performance for a trial attorney to fail to consult with

and present the testimony of a ballistics expert in a case such as this. Williams v.

Thaler, 684 F.3d 597, 604 (5th Cir. 2012) ("It is uncontested here that trial counsel's

performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Williams's counsel

failed to obtain any independent ballistics or forensics experts, and was therefore

unable to offer any meaningful challenge to the findings and conclusions ofthe state's

experts .... "); cert. denied, 133 S.Ct. 866 (2013); Draughon v. Dretke, 427 F.3d 286,

295-97 (5th Cir. 2005) (State habeas court unreasonably applied settled federal law in

holding that trial counsel had not been ineffective in failing to obtain forensic

examination ofpath of fatal bullet.), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1019 (2006); Soffar v.

Dretke, 368 F.3d 441, 478-79 (5th Cir. 2004) (Trial counsel was found ineffective

where he "failed to consult with a ballistics expert" even though the physical crime

scene evidence was a key issue in the case). 2

II. RESULTS OF BALLISTIC/DNA TESTING

Over the State's objection, this Court ordered the release of all the ballistic

evidence in this case for scientific testing. Included among the items released was a

bullet fragment identified by the State in its crime scene investigation as CSE-2 and

2
Likewise, the Court of Criminal Appeals has acknowledged that a trial attorney's failure
to present the testimony of a ballistics expert could constitute ineffective assistance of counsel
when it remanded a case for further factual development on this issue. Ex parte Vargas, 2006
WL 3086217 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 1, 2006).

2

14
at trial as State's Exhibit 66. Ballistics expert Richard Ernest was first able to

determine that State's Exhibit 66 was a .40 caliber bullet. See Attachment 2. Mr.

Ernest was able to remove biological material from this .40 caliber bullet. !d. This

biological material was later sent to Cellmark Forensics for testing. ld. Although

Cellmark did not have a sample of the DNA from the female victim in this case,

Cellmark did confirm that the biological material from the .40 caliber bullet contained

female DNA. See Attachment 3. Significantly, it was undisputed at trial that Mr.

Dewberry was firing a 9mm weapon and Brioni Dansby was frring a .40 caliber

weapon. 3 Moreover, the State actually argued in its closing that it was "common

sense" that CSE-2/Exhibit 66 came from Dansby's gun. See November 3, 2011

Transcript at 50.

In light of this finding, Mr. Dewberry submits that his trial counsel did, in fact,

afford him ineffective assistance of counsel because of his failure to undertake

scientific testing of the ballistics evidence in this case. The knowledge that the .40

caliber bullet contained traces of female DNA raises "a reasonable probability" of a

different result had this information been made known to the jury. Strickland v.

3
Moreover, according to the State's crime scene diagram, this bullet was located between
where Brioni was firing and where Mr. Dewberry was firing but it was located significantly
closer to Mr. Dewberry further indicating it was shot by Brioni toward Mr. Dewberry.
3

15
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). 4 Indeed, Mr. Dewberry submits that this

knowledge alone is sufficient to undermine the confidence in the verdict and sentence

in this case. Alternatively, it justifies a comparison ofthe victim's DNA, if available,

to the DNA removed from Exhibit 66 and/or a ballistic comparison between State's

4
Strickland defines a ..reasonable probability" as "a probability sufficient to undermine
confidence in the outcome." Id. at 694. Strickland itself expressly rejected an "outcome
determinative standard" requiring the defendant to show that counsel's deficient conduct "more
likely than not altered the outcome" of the case. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 693-94 (1984). Instead,
"[t]he result of a proceeding can be rendered unreliable, and hence the proceeding itself unfair,
even if the errors of counsel cannot be shown by a preponderance of the evidence to have
determined the outcome." I d. Thus, the "reasonable probability" standard - a probability
sufficient to wderrnine confidence in the outcome - is a less onerous burden than even the
preponderance of the evidence standard. Strickland makes this clear:

[W]e believe that a defendant need not show that counsel's deficient conduct more
likely than not altered the outcome in the case. This outcome-determinative
standard has several strengths. It defines the relevant inquiry in a way familiar to
courts, though the inquiry, as is inevitable, is anything but precise. The standard
also reflects the profowd importance of finality in criminal proceedings.
Moreover, it comports with the widely used standard for assessing motions for
new trial based on newly discovered evidence. See Brief for United States as
Amicus Curiae 19-20, and nn. 10, 11. Nevertheless, the standard is not quite
appropriate.

Even when the specified attorney error results in the omission of certain evidence,
the newly discovered evidence standard is not an apt source from which to draw a
prejudice standard for ineffectiveness claims. The high standard for newly
discovered evidence claims presupposes that all the essential elements of a
presumptively accurate and fair proceeding were present in the proceeding whose
result is challenged. An ineffective assistance claim asserts the absence of one of
the crucial assurances that the result of the proceeding is reliable, so finality
concerns are somewhat weaker and the appropriate standard of prejudice should
be somewhat lower. The result ofa proceeding can be rendered unreliable, and
hence the proceeding itselfunfair, even ifthe errors of counsel cannot be shown
by a preponderance of the evidence to have determined the outcome.

Id. at 693-94 (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
4

16
Exhibit 66 and Dansby's .40 caliber gun.

Respectfully submitted,

F. Clinton Broden
Tx. Bar 24001495
Broden, Mickelsen, Helms & Snipes
2600 State Street
Dallas, Texas 75204
214-720-9552
214-720-9594 (facsimile)

Attorney for Applicant
Stedmon Dewberry

5

17
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, F. Clinton Broden, certify that, on June 24, 2015, I caused a copy of the

above document to be served via first class mail, postage prepaid, on:

Bowie County District Attorney's Office
710 Bowie Drive
New Boston, Texas 75570-3512

F. Clinton Broden

6

18
ATTACHMENT 1

• <' 19
:

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY P• .ARNOLD

Jolmny P. Arnold, being at least eighteen years of age, pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code§ 132.001, deposes and states as foJJows:

1. I have been license to practice law in the State of Texas since 1977.

2. I was retained to represent Stedmon Dewbmy against murder charges brought in
the Fifth District Court in case number 11 F0763..00S

3. The simple fact is that the Dewberry fiunily could not afford to hire a ballistics
expert so I did not obtain an expert. I even had to cut my fee so they could afford to
hire an appellate attorney.

My name is Johnny P. Arnold, my date ofbirtb is November 11, 1949, and my address is

4015 N. Stateline Avenue, Texarkana, Texas 77503. I declare under penalty of perjury that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed in Bowie County, State of Texas, on the /5 day May .2014

10HNNY P. ARNOLD

20
ATTACHMENT 2

21
 No. __________________ ORIGlN.\L
EX PARTE ) 5th DISTRICT COURT
)
STEDMON DEWEBERRY ) BOWIE COUNTY, TEXAS

AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD N. ERNEST

Richard N. Ernest, being at least eighteen years of age, deposes and states as

follows:

1. I am an expert in the field of forensic ballistics and the
reconstruction of shooting scenes. I have been in this field since 1977
and have worked at the Georgia Bureau oflnvestigation and the Tarrant
County Medical Examiner's Office. I am a member of several
professional organizations and a Distinguished Member of the
Association of Firearms & Toolmarks Examiners. I have authored
several papers in these areas. I have worked on well over 10,000
firearms related cases including numerous cases involving shooting
scene reconstructions. I have testified in state, federal and military
courts throughout the nation and believe I have offered testimony in
over I ,000 cases. My resume is attached to this affidavit.

2. As per this Court's order, I was provided with what purported to
be all bullets, bullet components and fragments related to this case. I
was provided with seven items. I noted that it does not appear that I was
provided CSE-1 5 which was allegedly a bullet found at the crime scene.
Likewise, I was not provided CSE-13 which was described as a copper
bullet jacket removed from a white Mercury Grand Marquis.

3. Nevertheless, included in the material I received was a bullet
identified by the State in its crime scene investigation as "CSE-2." CSE-
2 was located in the vicinity of where Mr. Dewberry was alleged to have
been standing during the incident in question. In my internal notes I
refer to CSE-2 as Item 2A.

22
 4. Based upon my examination, I have concluded that CSE-2/Item
2A was fired from a .40 caliber weapon. My understanding is that it was
undisputed that, during the incident, Mr. Dewberry was firing a 9mm
weapon and Brioni Dansby was firing a .40 caliber weapon.

5. I determined that the .40 caliber bullet identified as CSE~2/Item
2A contained trace evidence. I removed a sampling of this trace
evidence and packaged it in an epp. tube and envelope and labeled the
package Item 2B. At the direction ofF. Clinton Broden I then sent Item
2B by overnight delivery to Cellrnark Laboratories for further testing.

My name is Richard N. Ernest, my date of birth is o2..fti.h 151 , and my address
f[

lS 'o5t> -,:. LA,JcA'Y[S"- A~~'f .fi~r ~~m,:r'l ..,,.,2- I

declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed in '1:Au~t.w:r County, State on£&\-s ,onthe qi_
day April, 2015.

1?1J 1{. Y--·
RICHARD N. ERNEST

23
. .

ATTACHMENT 3

24
•Cellmlrk 13988 DiplollUit Dr. Suite 100

~FORENSICS
Dallas TX 75234
Phone: 1-800-752-2774
........................... .....
" Report of Laboratory Examination
Fax: 214-271-8322

Aprill4, 2015
Supplemental- FR15-0025-A
F. Clinton Broden
Broden, Mickelsen, Helms & Snipes
2600 State Street
Dallas, TX 75204

CELLMARK FORENSICS NO: FRlS-0025
AGENCY CASE NO: 2014-0423-CRD
ADD'L AGENCY NO: N/A
EXHIBITS

Client Item CF Item Received Item Description PCR
2014-0423..CRD-001-2B FRIS-0025-01 1/30/2015 Trace Evidence y

RESULTS
DNA testing using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the MiniFiler™ STR Amplification Kit was
perfonned on Item 01. The loci tested and the results obtained for each tested sample are listed in Table 1
(see attachment).

DNA testing using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PiusTM Amplification
Kit was performed on Item 01. The loci tested and the results obtained for each tested sample are listed in
Table 2 (see attachment).

This report supplements Cellmark Forensics' Laboratory Report FRIS-0025 dated February 25, 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

FRIS-0025-01.01.1
The partial DNA profile obtained from the trace evidence is consistent with originating from an unknown
female. Comparison to a reference sample(s) will be made upon request.

DISPOSITION
In the absence of specific instruction, evidence will be retmned to the submitting agency by Federal Express
or another appropriate carrier.

Cellmark Forensics 201 ~23-CRD I FR15...(}()2S-A
Accredlled by the American Society of Crime Laborawry Director.s/Laboratory Accreditation Board· IntemaJjonaJ 1 of22s
 ·····-·-··········- --------------------
·.

REVIEW
The results described in this report have been reviewed by the folio
Technical
Analyst: Reviewer:
ratmy Director

Proceckuv used in tile analysis of this ~ase adhere to the Quality ASSUilloce Sranclartli for FORDSic DNA Ttsting Laboratories. CeUmarlc. Forcosics is accredited by the American Society
of Crime Laboralory Direct01'SIL.abonltoJY Accreditation Boanl. Tho row!Ja io thia ~on relate oaly to tllo item& tosted.

April 14, 201S Ce/Jmark Fore~ics 2014-0423-CRDI FR 15-0025-A
Accredited by the American Society ofCrime Laboratory Dlnctcm/Laboratory Accredil{ltiqn Board -lnt8matjonol 2 of226
 ..

13988 Diplomat Dr. Suite 100 •
ICellmark Report of Laboratory Examination Dallas TX 75234
Phone: 1-800-752-2774
~FORENSICS
................. , ........... .
Fax: 214-271-8322

llbC«p ~Tes111tg- 4/14/2015
Supplemental - FRIS-0025-A
CELLMARK FORENSICS NO: FRlS-0025
AGENCY CASE NO: 2014-0423-CRD
ADD'I, AGENCY NO: N/A

Table I MiDI Filer
Sample Name
........ ......
~
.......
Q
c;)

i.....
Q
~

~
'<
........aD
-
{l.l
N
Q
...
{l.l

a
0\
:l
~
...
Q
....
lrl

...
ril
Q
-""
0

t:J
{,)
~
""
Trace Evidence 11,13 )()- X- 24- 27,29 11, 12 16, 18 11- 23-
FRI S-0025-01.01.1
20 t 4-0423-CRD-001-28
I

X=Female
-=Below 5tochastic threshold Additional peak(s) may be present below limit of detection.
The results listed in the table do not depict intensity differences. Only alleles exceeding validated analysis threshold are included in table.

1\.l
.....
Supplemental- FRlS-0025-A
Accredited by the Ameriam Socifty of Crime LabQTQJory Directon!Laboratory Accreditati011 Board- 111/ematiortaJ I of 2
1 Cell11181'k Report of Laboratory Examination
13988 Diplomat Dr. Suite I 00
Dallas TX 75234
Phone: 1-800-752-2774
•

EFORENSICS Fax: 214-271-8322 •'
IMoq) $iiKiellJTesllng GI'QVII 4/14/2015
Supplemental- FR15-0025-A
CELLMARK FORENSICS NO: FRIS-0025
AGENCY CASE NO: 2014-0423-CRD
ADD'L AGENCY NO: N/A

Table% ldentifiler Pin
..,...
- --... ...
Sample Name
..,on
.......
-
oc
~
= 0 on .... ....
1"'- 01 QO
oc
....
~
1"'-
...Do ~ < ~ ~
i..... ~ ...~.... i.... ~
Ill rn OD
ril N ~
8 ....
I,D
~ ~ ~ .... ~
Q Q Q v = Q Q Q Cl
_i
Trace Evidence NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
FRIS-002S-OLOLl
20 14-0423-CRD-001-28 I

--- - L__ -

X=Female
NR = No Result
The results listed in the table do not depict intensity differences. Only alleles exceeding validated analysis tlm:shold are included in table.

N
00

SuJiplemental - FR I 5-(){)2.5-A
A.ccrediteri by tire American Society ofCrime LoboraJory Directors/Laboratory Accndilalion Boarri- lnternalioPIDI 2 of 2
 ;-iLED FOR RECOHO
No. 11 F0763-005-A ZO 15 AUG I 0 PM J: 31
STATE OF TEXAS

vs.
:.:~~!BOWIECO X
------ J'JF.PII Y
STEDMON DEWBERRY BOWIE COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

The Court is of the opinion that the Defendant is entitled to a hearing on his writ of

habeas corpus. It is therefore ordered that a hearing is set for the 28th day of August, 2015 at

9:00 o'clock a.m. in the 5th Judicial District Courtroom located on the 2nd floor of the Bowie

County Courthouse, New Boston, Texas.

Signed and entered on the 3rd day of August, 2015.

Bill Miller, District Judge

'29
 I!
IIIIII
IIII .::t·Lr·r, rno
; ! L. ;,I , \,'1 I
cr:c·'ORO
r\ '-

2ul5 AUG 17 AH 9: II
Craig L. Henry - ;!
.
: \_,c!
: ~- ..,. j

Gi3m l
••-_-_.
I '...1 f '.

CLEH!~ BOWIE CO TX
ATTORNEY AT LAW

Billy Fox Branson
Bowie County District Clerk
Bowie County Courthouse
New Boston, Texas

Re: State of Texas vs. Stedmon Dewberry
Cause No. 11F0763-005-A

Dear Billy:

Enclosed herewith please find an original and one (1) copy of Order Rescheduling
Hearing on Defendant's Writ of Habeas Corpus. Please file the original, affix your file stamp to
the copy and return same to my office.

By copy of this letter, I am serving a true and correct copy of the foregoing letter on
Lauren Sutton, Assistant District Attorney for Bowie County via hand delivery - return receipt
requested.

Thank you for your attention in this regard. Should you have any questions or concerns,
please don't hesitate to call.

Sincerely,

CLH/kf
Enclosures
Cc: Lauren Sutton- hand delivery- return receipt requested
 No. IIF0763-005-A 2[! 15 AUG 17 AM 9: 11

STATE OF TEXAS

vs.
STEDMON DEWBERRY BOWIE COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

The August 28th hearing previously set in this case is hereby reset for September II,

2015 @ 10: 00 a.m. in the 51h Judicial District Courtroom located on the 2"d floor of the Bowie

County Courthouse, New Boston, Texas.

Signed and entered on the 6th day of August 2015.

Bill Miller, District Judge

31
 RECEIPT FOR EXHIBITS~ CCP. 2.21 & TRC 75a

§ IN THE DISTRICT COURT
§
../'("
-'}·1 • •- J Ic:o- R--, RVf:'.',:.·:·
.-.:' .-. ;~r, ._ •··· ~- " ..

! ........ § STH JUDI~IA~rnf~~t PH J2: 27
§ ..... v-o,
~ ~~~... § BOWIECO~I~r80~,11£CO.D:.
I, L"lie P. Bat,., Court Reporter fo~ the 5th District Court, do here~/~<
Branson, District Clerk in and for Bowie County, Texas, the following exhibits in the above numbered
and styled cause:

Exhibits

1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
6. 6.
7. 7.
8. 8.
9. 9.
10. 10.
11. 11.
12. 12.
13. 13.
14. 14.
15. 15.

~~
Court Reporter
I, Billy Fox Branson, District Clerk, do hereby acknowledge receipt of the above-listed exhibits in the
above numbered a:"d styled cause.

Dated this the rAA day of ~ 'zo1.5_.
Billy Fox Branson, District Clerk
Bowie Countyt Texas

, Deputy

32
 ;:!LED FOH RECORD
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
2815 SEP It PH 3: 15
No. WR~83, 308-01

------------------------------------------~~?-~~~~~~~y
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE FINDI
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

On or about May 13, 2014, Applicant, Stedmon Dewberry, filed a Writ of Habeas

Corpus, followed by an Amended Writ of Habeas Corpus on July 21, 2014, asserting ineffective

assistance of trial counsel. On or about July 30, 2014, Applicant filed a Motion to Release Items

for Testing. The 5th District Court held a hearing on said Motion on September 11, 2014.

Thereafter, on September 23, 2014, the Court entered an Order for Scientific Testing, and on

October 21, 2014, the court entered an Order for evidence to be turned over to the Texarkana

Police Department and then to Forensic Ballistics Consultant and Laboratory in Ft. Worth, Texas

for testing and submission of a report. The Order further stated that upon the completion of

testing, the evidence should be returned to the Texarkana Police Department by overnight

delivery.

On or about June 18,2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals entered an Order directing the

District Court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate

to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus reliefv.ithin 90 days of the Order. The

Order further stated that an extension of time shall be obtained from the Court.

On or about JW1e 26, 2015, App1icant filed a Supplemental Memorandum of Law in

support of Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, attaching the Affidavit of his ballistics expert,

and discussing the expert's findings. As a result of the ballistics testing performed by the expert,

a hearing was held on September ll, 20 15 to discuss the need for additional testing to determine

33
whether the biological matter allegedly found on a bullet matched the victim's DNA. The Court

ordered that the State take possession of the bullet in question and attempt to secure additional

DNA testing on the bullet or otherwise determine that no DNA matching the victim could be

found absent exhuming the victim. The Court has ordered the State to present a preliminary

determination to the Court within fourteen days of the September 11, 2015 hearing on (i)

whether comparative DNA samples can be obtained and (ii) the time frame tor conducting a

comparative DNA analysis if sample can be obtained.

Accordingly. until it is determined whether DNA testing may be performed, and if so,

until said testing is performed, the District Court cannot make findings of fact and conclusions of

law as additional forensic analysis is required.

To further complicate matters, the Court ordered the District Court to order trial counsel

to respond to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Applicant's trial counsel is

deceased, and therefore. an affidavit responding to Applicant's ineffective assistance of counsel

claims cannot be obtained from trial counsel.

Therefore, the Court requests an extension of time to enter findings of facts and

conclusions of law in connection with Applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus to and

until a determination is made as to whether DNA testing can be performed, and if so, until such

times as testing is performed, a report is prepared and the Court has an opportunity to evaluate

said report and prepare its findings of fact and conclusions oflaw.

Signed this 11th day ofSeptember 2015.

Bill Miller,Judge
5th District Court of Bowie County

CCA No. WR-83, 308-01 Extension of Time
Page2 34
 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF BOWIE

I, BILLY FOX, Clerk of the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing are true and correct copies of the
originals as on file in my office.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE SAID COURT at
office in New Boston, Texas, this the on this the 16th day of September, 2015.

BILLY FOX, DISTRICT CLERK
BOWIE COUNTY, TEXAS

\\

ori Caraway, Supervisor
Criminal Department

35