N rtt FILED IN
14th COURT OF APPEALS
HOUSTON. TEXAS
.PoutsTetmh C.00R.T of R??ewmp aug252015
CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Op TEx^S CLERK
-CM} Ki -1 s-MCf_C ft', \LI -is-£^i£^
"T^x-. R. h?P, pfloc. /Role r-,— ^
•Sat* C^H!
-2-
i_ • (foPir^
W<£ r^^ic Cigar \v~, A S-^fSxo^7
f^/jnj -^4- ^V'3 c^tw^ rce^ -fedf-evzof CcnXt".
3
TV&aML \o-e--e^ Wey^ 4(a-€_ ^Tri
1V^ ^jurV ^ w>4 ^^^ vls v
0lw'i"8-,ni.v\^
W» V^HO^KS *3w-# 4-k^r sKM
fe, Such, ) ^^ W^-e
5X-e 9voc ^ .
RECORD REQUEST
PLEASE COMPLETE BEFORE SUBMITTING
JUDGMENT* SENTENCE
COURT MINUTE BOOK
INDEX PRIOR TO 1969
NATURALIZATION RECORD
APPEAL / TRANSCRIPTS
FEE DOCKET BOOK
Other:
Courtly Vol. J> Page
Customer's Name Rff-it
Telephone Number
| *****FOR HCDCO USE ONLY*****
Complete when unable to locate record/file:
Case file currently in Court #
Further research required
Check CFTS for case file location
Check prior locations (if applicable)
Check refiles
Check oversized files
Check DEEDS
Check every 10,100,1,000,10,000 case file
range of case year and all years
( ) Inventory entire year
Removed By: .
Deputy:
Date Pulled Time
Rev. FHR11-08-2009 TechRecCenter003.doc
•2 .cff ~>
HEOOROER'S MEMORANDUM:
At the time cl r-jcordri lien,.ih'is instrument was
found to be inau'-quii'o 'pr'.'^.bwt photographic
roprodtiction ijec-au'-:;.. of illegibility, carbon ar
pjioio copy, discolored paper, etc. All btocknuts
additions and fclianges were presstit at the time
liiu insliiKMoni wus filsifl and recorded.
a en O -3 52!
a H 33
pa O
oo
to
w
O
PI 0 3 •M
2; w a M M
o o w H > '•4
CO
>
o
I—I
>
as
«!
H
O
pd
<<
O
CO
M
IM
-«J
w n *) O 1—•
o 0 Ti ON
* S3 S <5
as *a
•r--
S pd
•4 M w M
o H
H M
W 0 •
•S H tr1
• 33 w
<
m
nd S3
O h-3 M
55 1-3
CO •
O pa
s
55 0:
o
M O d
W 55
»—i tr1
a
55 >
*1 55 O
O
W CO >
a o
25
p-j
a
8
55 S3
O
W
O
M
PJ
f
GENERAL ORDERS OF THE COURT,
!!.*\^ ^vro^'Ti'v? th^'
]v. ft.., C--..
''""I. i'"l l.lij --„,.--L .-. ..:.: ..... i-Miii-ii.
atri his attorney. Permission to appssl wiii not be granted
in till^ odid alkali HdJufcjj i,L!!IU:idi;ul: by Ilk <;i)uTl
"T FOUND Tl-F DEFENDANT GUILTY; AND '!M
* ^DAY OF J^MLlWM' w^O3 773 C
-«tf ASSESSED TK£ FUMSriMZtlT AT
(Vjs^.
OV COjl'S'-'i
.^Bin-ife
^ ^-^-^
f^y «.•
('AtguL^r an ^k^n-i-x^vi^ I ^dd^» TVfrnriaqt if pamled. to reimburse-
Harris County the sum of $ _/££, said amount having
hflp.n paiH pmrn appointed counsel to represent Defendant
The Court wrtMr lliiils |i^t to £ Wff1^
II. .. " "w.*. ' '" ' ••-•-•-••-, : '
:-wi. ... "' r i r
01,^.Vi>>—Hrr
amaifflt of S-2v± ~~
H3308 D Pr:.2
II
RECORDER'S MEMORANDUM:
At the time of recordation, this instrument was . . )
y# 7 -^ found to be inadequate for the best photographic
reproduction because of illegibility, carbon or
pnoto copy, discolored paper, etc. All blockouts.
additions and changes were present at ttie ttn»
the instrument was tiled and recorded.
09 > o H 55
8 O
o a
OJ o
as
OJ
o o /• w
25
?i 55 3
U1
CO
is:
-O
O
*3 3 a
*i
*1 CO
»
H
CO W
is
<
•'•u.i • . 3 !
i*3
o
a >
%
S a
>
5? >
PI
s
I —I
S3
re
o
S3 M
55 V H
o
o M
o
HEFT SE: tt
r1
a
3
3=»
:> O3'
g 55 s
n.Q a. o
: i 3- :j <
h—» •>
s-;i.o-
1) Cfitt
o
_ °
92
UP
00 o CO
to H
'3 raj? 93
CO
~» •-,, O 00
•3
So &•
.0
.«
S-.-IT3
o
V
rr|
5'
tin?
055
*3
o
•o
r>
o
3-agL o 2. I
r..,.
5i t
7°
$
'v.
5^-7
VjP
p
FILED.
MAY 2 1989
NO-
528856 •. RONALD UWAYNE WHITEFIELD (1 337
GENERAL ORDER,OF\COURT — .--,r-,,-a ig"r>T—A TO'-
apr»« «9jpEu. ;' • vAiMPLAir
THE STATE OF TEXAS VS.
PRQB*'" "WEE HEARING SET FOR APR '/ 5 MBQ
OFFENSE:
BURGLARY OF MOTOR VEHICLE
APR 25 1989 thr DffnmAW,>jbifiM»>-.APPEARED
thpfrrdk WITHOUT COUNSEL
The Defendant received his statutory wamu^
„5 •£ a> ATTORNEY FOR STATE : ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT: from Lite Court and aaknowledgpa tn the Dmrt
ffofj that he understood said warnings.
ED
THE DEFENDANT FILED Avf^UPERS^ATH. "T"
THE COURT APPOINTED .LZq.
^ .£ -O vi3 « £? o AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT.
Q .£> ft- ••& ._- Ci. >
NO BOND
9f^ g'-J J-g SCIRE FACIAS INFORMATION: AMOUNT OF BOND_ COURT RULEDTRIAL
THAT PROBABLE CAUSE EXISTS pac Sc
EXAMINING ON EXISTS; CASE
BONDSMAN AGENDA ON. 19 , GKAN]
I? ^ =V # «-s *• s-F-NO • :—
m Cj - c ° XJ C
& o- o o < e 5
*£ ui o yo o"2
g- 5
—— %ftyT%$zt
~}L * -
ARRAIGNMI
M'~§ feog-£
*wa 1989 FjjJKLQ
SETTINGS: OTHER INFORMATION:
y?p /%**{•
•THE DEFENDANT, »PEARED
IN PERSON WITH COUNSEL
JUN 15 1989 THE DEFENDANT,
IN PERSON WITH COUNSEL
tfe^
C3308 D Pg.i
'GENERAL ORDERS OF THE COURT.
£/Z7~
THE DEFENDANT FILED A PAU& ATH.
"~~-
THE COURT APPOINTED —
AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT.
/^^ "7-26&1
^ - 1 1989
N THE DEFENDANT, L^VIX^jLifirJ APPEARED
IN PT-.r'JaUN WITH aAu55hL _C|Oj^ri/Vc.C^U^
AoL'T. D.A. T). ' " "
LT. JjkPUril'LI-t: Q6~e5"T
HON \T^erOfV>^ , PRESI
^>
DEFENDANT, WAIVED ARRAIGNMENT AND FOWML
ncficiMo or Titc ihdictm^t, m o?m court
PLEADED
Jury WPitfffl- hy npfonrlrnt in nnrenn anii in writingi in opon oourtj woi»»r approved
ny !.i,.3 pf Sfllli iM'Vi I ••>;-g-.-,-l:-1ni j- • :-. r .-:-;inr ciij't-by ^ST(L^A>7t)C_
uBTa^oarti-s .p.d& eriw/ea; adjudged guilty; P6n3it>'/rsc-on.^u-'.c»itii) ot'tliS&v ten days time waived; r^feirdant senteneed to not
I" The G^urt has lassessedcpunishment not exceeding that leas man L..__ vears nol' mnrr? than ^
•fecommendgd Ijfcthe Stdtg'affi agreed to bv the Defendant vaars in the Taxas rtenait-nflnt nf r.nrrpr«nn«
;-§nd*'his attornsy:'Permission ;t6.:appeal will not be granted
in this-MSft-ahsfint-writtftii anthnifoatinn hy thw hnnrt ^uH^c-v <(n ^ HrC^ ^r^^V 8 -
"''""Ti IC COURT FOUMOTI ICDIFENDAMTni III TY; AND THAT ^nftMQQ
03^06,'b...«?~r.r.
Q&2 DAY Or ,.-.nhfUL>--- ' ' . ^ "...
;:..:Tf ,.5Sc3SED THE F^SH^T ,<:-uX.C|b6 f^C t^t cu-n