Steven Webb, D/B/A Leander Trux-N-Karz v. Glenco Upshaw

ACCEPTED 03-15-00590-CV 7416312 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2015 3:16:04 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK _______________________________________________________________________     No.  03-­‐15-­‐00590-­‐CV   FILED IN _______________________________________________________________________   3rd COURT OF APPEALS   AUSTIN, TEXAS IN  THE  COURT  OF  APPEALS   10/16/2015 3:16:04 PM THIRD  JUDICIAL  DISTRICT  OF  TEXAS   JEFFREY D. KYLE AT  AUSTIN,  TEXAS   Clerk ______________________________________________________________________     STEVEN  WEBB  D/B/A  LEANDER  TRUX-­‐N-­‐KARZ     Appellant,     VS.     GLENCO  UPSHAW     Appellee.   _____________________________________________________________________     On  Appeal  from  the  368th  District  Court   of  Williamson  County,  Texas   Hon.  Rick  Kennon,  Judge  Presiding   Trial  Court  Case  No.  11-­‐613-­‐C368   _____________________________________________________________________     APPELLANT’S  FIRST  MOTION  FOR  EXTENSION  OF  TIME   _____________________________________________________________________     N.  West  Short   State  Bar  No.  00788407     WEST  SHORT  &  ASSOCIATES,  P.C.   313  West  10th  Street   Georgetown,  Texas  78626   512.864.3911   512.864.3966  (Fax)     ATTORNEYS  FOR  APPELLANT  STEVEN  WEBB  D/B/A  LEANDER  TRUX-­‐N-­‐KARZ                 APPELLANT’S  FIRST  MOTION  FOR  EXTENSION  OF  TIME       Steven   Webb,   misnamed   herein   as   “Steven   Webb   d/b/a   Leander   Trux-­‐N-­‐ Karz,”  Appellant,  respectfully  asks  the  Court  to  extend  the  time  to  file  his  brief,  and   in  support  hereof,  would  show  the  following:   A.  Introduction     1.   Appellant  Steven  Webb  is  an  individual,  and  is  one  of  the  owners  of  a   used  car  dealership  in  Leander,  Texas,  called  “Leander  Trux-­‐N-­‐Karz,  Inc.”     2.   The   trial   court   entered   a   post-­‐answer   summary   judgment   against   Appellant  by  default  on  September  10,  2015.   3.   Appellant  filed  a  pro  se  Notice  of  Appeal  and  a  Motion  for  New  Trial  on   September  15,  2015.   4.   Appellant,   through   the   undersigned   counsel,   then   filed   a   First   Amended   Motion   for   New   Trial   on   October   5,   2015,   contending   that   because   Appellant   was   not   aware   of   the   hearing   on   Appellee’s   Motion   for   Summary   Judgment,   he   should   be   granted   a   new   trial   under   the   Craddock   test   and   in   the   interests  of  justice.   5.   Appellant’s   First   Amended   Motion   for   New   Trial   is   currently   set   for   hearing  on  October  29,  2015,  and,  if  not  ruled  upon,  will  be  denied  by  operation  of   law  on  November  24,  2015.   B.  Arguments  and  Authorities     6.   Appellant’s  brief  is  currently  due  on  October  28,  2015.     7.   No   extension   has   been   previously   granted   to   extend   the   time   for   Appellant  to  file  his  brief.   APPELLANT’S  FIRST  MOTION  FOR  EXTENSION  OF  TIME  –  PAGE  2  of  4       8.   This   request   is   being   made   because   this   appeal   will   become   moot   if   the   trial   court   grants   Appellant’s   Motion   for   New   Trial,   and   because   even   if   Appellant’s   motion   is   denied   by   the   trial   court,   the   trial   court’s   actions   could   substantially  change  the  issues  in  this  appeal.     9.   Appellant  therefore  requests  an  additional  30  days  after  the  trial  court   has   ruled   on   the   Motion   for   New   Trial,   or   the   Motion   for   New   Trial   is   denied   by   operation  of  law,  whichever  is  earlier,  to  file  his  brief.   PRAYER       For  the  reasons  stated  above,  Appellant  respectfully  requests  an  extension  of   time   to   file   his   brief   until   thirty   (30)   days   after   the   trial   court   has   ruled   on   the   Motion   for   New   Trial   that   is   currently   before   it,   or   the   Motion   for   New   Trial   is   denied  by  operation  of  law,  whichever  is  earlier.               Respectfully  submitted,                 WEST  SHORT  &  ASSOCIATES,  P.C.                 By:   /s/  N.  West  Short                     N.  West  Short                 State  Bar  No.  00788407                 Michael  Howell                 State  Bar  No.  24009368                 313  West  10th  Street               Georgetown,  TX  78626               512.864.3911               512.864.3966  (Fax)               west.short@westshortlawfirm.com               michael.howell@westshortlawfirm.com                 ATTORNEYS  FOR  APPELLANT,               STEVEN  WEBB           APPELLANT’S  FIRST  MOTION  FOR  EXTENSION  OF  TIME  –  PAGE  3  of  4     CERTIFICATE  OF  CONFERENCE       I  certify  that  I  contacted  Cheryl  McGirr,  lead  counsel  for  Appellee,  on  October   16,   2015,   to   determine   whether   she   was   opposed   to   this   motion,   but   she   was   out   of   the  office  for  the  day  and  I  was  unable  to  speak  with  her.                 /s/  N.  West  Short                       N.  West  Short       CERTIFICATE  OF  SERVICE       I  certify  that  a  true  and  correct  copy  of  the  above  and  foregoing  has  been  e-­‐ served  via  ProDoc  on  this  16th  day  of  October,  2015:       Cheryl  McGirr     McGirr  Law,  PC     201  S.  Lakeline  Blvd.,  Suite  301     Cedar  Park,  Texas  78613     COUNSEL  FOR  APPELLEE                 /s/  N.  West  Short                       N.  West  Short       APPELLANT’S  FIRST  MOTION  FOR  EXTENSION  OF  TIME  –  PAGE  4  of  4