DENY; and Opinion Filed December 1, 2015.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-01414-CV
IN RE TERRENCE M. GORE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-12707-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Myers
This original proceeding arises from a contempt proceeding based on relator’s failure to
pay child support. Relator first filed this proceeding seeking a petition for writ of habeas corpus,
but then amended his pleading to seek mandamus relief. The issues presented in both realtor’s
petition for writ of habeas corpus and petition for writ of mandamus are identical. Although
relator states the trial court has issued a capias warrant for his arrest, it does not appear relator is
incarcerated.
On numerous prior occasions we have addressed and rejected the complaints relator
raises in both the petition for writ of mandamus and the petition for writ of habeas corpus. See In
re Gore, 454 S.W.3d 711, 711 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2015) (mem. op.) (denying petition for writ
of mandamus asserting virtually identical complaints); In re Gore, 05-14-01422-CV, 2014 WL
6466845, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 19, 2014, orig. proceeding), (mem. op.) (denying
petition for writ of habeas corpus because record failed to include proof relator was actually
restrained); In re Gore, No. 05-14-00103-CV, 2014 WL 476784, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb.
5, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying virtually identical petition for writ of
mandamus); In re Gore, No. 05-13-00364-CV, 2013 WL 1274740, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas
Mar. 20, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying petition for writ of mandamus raising
many of same issues). We do not revisit those issues here. We DENY the petition.
LANA MYERS
JUSTICE
151414F.P05
–2–