UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1785
CARL THURSTON WASHINGTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE (NRO); FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION; BERKELEY COUNTY, WV; CITY OF MARTINSBURG, WV;
BLACKWELL REALTY; POTOMAC HOUSING REALTY; CHRISTOPHER CODY,
908 Florida Avenue Martinsburg WV 25402 Property Owner;
MICHELLE CODY, 908 Florida Avenue Martinsburg WV 25402
Property Owner; HAINES AGENCY; UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE
UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES (DCJS); UNITED
STATES POSTAL SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE
INSPECTOR GENERAL; CIA OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL; FBI
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES; UNIVERSAL SERVICES OF AMERICA;
SHULTZ REALTY; JC SMITH LLC,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
District Judge. (3:16-cv-00022-JPB-RWT)
Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Thurston Washington, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Erin K.
Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney; Matthew Robert
Whitler, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC; Floyd
McKinley Sayre, III, BOWLES RICE, LLP; Kenneth Joseph Barton,
Jr., Kelsey L. Swaim, Eric Jett Hulett, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Carl Thurston Washington, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his complaint alleging defamation,
assault, fraud, property damage, and violations of his civil
rights, among other claims. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Nat’l
Reconnaissance Office, No. 3:16-cv-00022-JPB-RWT (N.D. W. Va.
June 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3