UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6714
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC MARTIN VAN BUREN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00066-NKM-1)
Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Martin Van Buren, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eric Martin Van Buren appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his “motion to have heard new substantive rule
per the court’s discretion,” and his motion to correct his
presentence report pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. Van Buren
also appeals the district court’s subsequent order denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Van Buren, No. 3:00-cr-
00066-NKM-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2016; May 20, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2