Case: 15-30665 Document: 00513704832 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 15-30665 FILED
Summary Calendar October 4, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BRADLEY SMITH,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:13-CR-52-1
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Bradley Smith has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Smith has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us
to make a fair evaluation of Smith’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel;
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-30665 Document: 00513704832 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2016
No. 15-30665
we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral
review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Smith’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2