Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

           VOESTALPINE STAHL GMBH,
                   Appellant

                           v.

                 ARCELORMITTAL,
                       Appellee
                ______________________

                      2016-1407
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,214,
95/001,350, 95/001,353.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   MAXWELL JAMES PETERSEN, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard
& Smith, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.

    DAVID JAMES CUSHING, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Wash-
ington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
RICHARD CLAY TURNER; MARK JAMES DEBOY, Edell
Shapiro and Finnan, Gaithersburg, MD.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



    PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER,
Circuit Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


  October 11, 2016            /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
       Date                   Peter R. Marksteiner
                              Clerk of Court