NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 3 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS CARLOS CEBALLOS-RAMIREZ, No. 15-70460
Petitioner, Agency No. A200-244-346
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 25, 2016**
Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Luis Carlos Ceballos-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to
reconsider its denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings to seek
administrative closure. We dismiss the petition for review.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of Ceballos-Ramirez’s
motion to reconsider its underlying discretionary decision regarding administrative
closure. See Diaz-Covarrubias v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 1114, 1120 (9th Cir. 2009)
(this court lacks jurisdiction to review the denial of administrative closure for lack
of a sufficiently meaningful standard to evaluate the decision); Vilchiz-Soto v.
Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (limiting the court’s jurisdiction to
review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider its underling discretionary
determination).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2 15-70460