Burns v. Proclean

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 MICHAEL BURNS, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 35,496 5 PROCLEAN OF ARIZONA and 6 TRAVELERS INSURANCE, 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellees. 8 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 9 Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge 10 Rod Dunn 11 Rio Rancho, NM 12 for Appellant 13 Sebastian A. Dunlap 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Appellees 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 VIGIL, Judge. 18 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 1 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 2 {2} AFFIRMED. 3 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 _______________________________ 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 ___________________________ 8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 9 ___________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 2