United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3027
___________________________
Andre Griffin
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant
v.
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: November 2, 2016
Filed: November 7, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Andre Griffin is serving a 150-month prison term imposed after he pleaded
guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. In a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion,
Griffin claimed, as relevant, that his guilty plea was the product of his counsel’s
ineffective assistance for failing to investigate whether Griffin qualified as a career
offender, because absent such status, his plea agreement was unknowing and
involuntary. The district court1 denied relief upon concluding, in part, that Griffin
qualified as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 in light of his prior convictions.
The court granted a certificate of appealability, however, on Griffin’s claim that he
received ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, Griffin concedes that he had a
qualifying “controlled substance offense,” but argues that his 2004 California
conviction for assault with great bodily injury under Cal. Penal Code § 245(a)(1)--a
“wobbler” statute--is not a qualifying felony “crime of violence,” and that his counsel
was relatedly ineffective for failing to investigate.
Following careful review, see Walker v. United States, 810 F.3d 568, 575 (8th
Cir.), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 2042 (2016), we agree with the district court that
Griffin’s counsel did not provide ineffective assistance. There is no indication in the
record that counsel would have been successful in taking the position that Griffin, who
received a sentence of 3 years in prison on his prior assault conviction, was not a
career offender within the meaning of the Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1);
United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1189-90 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v.
Adams, 716 F.3d 1066, 1070 (8th Cir. 2013) (per curiam).
The judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of
Nebraska.
-2-