Shirley Remmert v. United States

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHIRLEY VENOYA REMMERT, No. 15-16471 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-mc-80178-VC v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince G. Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 25, 2016** Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Shirley Venoya Remmert appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her leave to file a complaint under a vexatious litigant order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Remmert leave to file a complaint against defendants because Remmert attempted to file the complaint in violation of a vexatious litigant ordered entered against her. See id. AFFIRMED. 2 15-16471