Opinion issued December 20, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-16-00557-CV
———————————
KERRY FIELDS, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND TONYA FIELDS AND KERRY
FIELDS, AS PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS OF KRIS FIELDS AND
TYLER FIELDS, Appellants
V.
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1063354
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Kerry Fields, an Individual, and Tonya Fields and Kerry Fields,
as Parents and Next Friends of Kris Fields and Tyler Fields (collectively “Fields”),
attempt to appeal from the trial court’s July 1, 2016 order denying their motion for
summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Generally, appellate courts have jurisdiction only over appeals from final
judgments unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal. CMH Homes v. Perez,
340 S.W.3d 444, 447–48 (Tex. 2011); see N.Y. Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Sanchez,
799 S.W.2d 677, 679–80 (Tex. 1990) (citing N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 200
S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966) (“In the absence of a special statute making an
interlocutory order appealable, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in
the case . . . to be final and appealable.”). An order denying a summary judgment
motion is not a final judgment and, absent certain exceptions not applicable here, is
not an appealable interlocutory order. Cincinnati Life Ins. Co. v. Cates, 927 S.W.2d
623, 625 (Tex. 1996); City of Houston v. Aster, L.P., 403 S.W.3d 354, 357 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, pet. denied) (citations omitted); see In re M.G., No.
01-05-00426-CV, 2006 WL 1549754, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 8,
2006, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citations omitted) (“When a party attempts to appeal a
non-appealable interlocutory order, appellate courts have no jurisdiction except to
declare the interlocutory nature of the order and to dismiss the appeal.”).
On October 18, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that the Court
might dismiss the appeal unless Fields, by November 1, 2016, filed a response
demonstrating that the Court has jurisdiction over this appeal. After our notice
2
issued, appellee, GEICO Advantage Insurance Company, filed a motion to dismiss
the appeal and award GEICO damages for a frivolous appeal and a judgment for
costs. Fields has not responded to GEICO’s motion or this Court’s notice, or
otherwise demonstrated that this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We deny GEICO’s motion for damages and costs
and dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Lloyd.
3