Abatement Order filed December 20, 2016
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-15-00806-CR
____________
JARVIS L. BARBER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 7
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2008621
ABATEMENT ORDER
Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Frederick Wilson. On
November 28, 2016, time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no
motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel was
notified on December 1, 2016, that no brief had been received. No response from
appellant has been received.
Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (a copy of which is attached) the judge of
County Criminal Court at Law No. 7 shall (1) immediately conduct a hearing, at
which appellant, appellant’s counsel, and state’s counsel shall participate, either in
person or by video teleconference, to determine (a) whether appellant desires to
prosecute his appeal; (b) whether appellant is indigent; (c) if not indigent, whether
appellant has abandoned the appeal or whether appellant has failed to make
necessary arrangements for filing a brief; (d) the reason for the failure to file a brief;
(e) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, a date certain when appellant’s brief
will be filed; and (2) prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the
hearing. If appellant is indigent, the judge shall take such measures as may be
necessary to assure effective representation of counsel, which may include the
appointment of new counsel. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is
made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial
clerk to forward a transcribed record of the hearing, a videotape or compact disc, if
any, containing a recording of the video teleconference, and a supplemental clerk’s
record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with
the clerk of this court on or before January 19, 2017.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the
trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will
also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or
the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any
party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to
schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court’s order. If the parties do not
request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and
notify the parties of such date.
PER CURIAM
RULE 38. REQUISITES OF BRIEFS
Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. Failure of Appellant to File Brief.
(b) Criminal Cases.
(1) Effect. An appellant’s failure to timely file a brief does not
authorize either dismissal of the appeal or, except as provided in (4), consideration
of the appeal without briefs.
(2) Notice. If the appellant’s brief is not timely filed, the appellate clerk
must notify counsel for the parties and the trial court of that fact. If the appellate
court does not receive a satisfactory response within ten days, the court must order
the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether the appellant
desires to prosecute his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or, if not indigent,
whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate
findings and recommendations.
(3) Hearing. In accordance with (2), the trial court must conduct any
necessary hearings, make appropriate findings and recommendations, and have a
record of the proceedings prepared, which record—including any order and
findings—must be sent to the appellate court.
(4) Appellate Court Action. Based on the trial court’s record, the
appellate court may act appropriately to ensure that the appellant’s rights are
protected, including initiating contempt proceedings against appellant’s counsel. If
the trial court has found that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeal,
or that the appellant is not indigent but has not made the necessary arrangements for
filing a brief, the appellate court may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice
may require.