Case: 15-31032 Document: 00513834787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 15-31032 January 13, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
In Re: The Complaint of Omega Protein, Incorporated,
as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere,
for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability.
OMEGA PROTEIN, INCORPORATED,
as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere,
Plaintiff–Appellant,
versus
CHARLES BRUMFIELD, JR.; ROBERT LANCELIN, Sr.,
Defendants–Appellees.
No. 15-31060
In Re: The Complaint of Omega Protein, Incorporated,
as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere,
for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability.
OMEGA PROTEIN, INCORPORATED,
as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere,
Plaintiff–Appellant,
versus
ANTHONY SCOTT; ROBERT LANCELIN, SR.,
Defendants–Appellants,
Case: 15-31032 Document: 00513834787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2017
versus
LOUISIANA MARINE TOWING, L.L.C.,
Defendant–Appellee.
In re: The Complaint of LOUISIANA MARINE TOWING, L.L.C.,
as Owner of the M/V Lady Lauren, Its Engines, Gear, Tackle, etc.,
for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability.
LOUISIANA MARINE TOWING, L.L.C.,
as Owner of the M/V Lady Lauren, Its Engines, Gear, Tackle, etc.,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY SCOTT; ROBERT LANCELIN, SR.; OMEGA PROTEIN
INCORPORATED,
Defendants–Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
No. 6:14-CV-469
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2
Case: 15-31032 Document: 00513834787 Page: 3 Date Filed: 01/13/2017
In this matter stemming from an allision between two vessels, the dis-
trict court awarded damages and determined the value of a vessel. Various
parties seek relief on appeal.
This case was tried thoroughly and patiently by the district court. We
have read the briefs and applicable parts of the record and the relevant law
and have heard the oral arguments of five attorneys. There is no reversible
error. The judgment and underlying decisions are fair. The judgment as to all
parties and all issues is AFFIRMED.
3