Livingston v. State

Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 15 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-16-529 MARK JEFFERY LIVINGSTON Opinion Delivered January 18, 2017 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE OUACHITA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 52CR-15-59] V. HONORABLE ROBIN CARROLL, JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge Mark Jeffery Livingston appeals from his Ouachita County Circuit Court conviction for rape. Appellate counsel has filed a motion with this court to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4- 3(k) (2016). The motion is accompanied by a no-merit brief containing an abstract and addendum of the proceedings below. The abstract and addendum in counsel’s brief include all objections and motions decided adversely to Livingston, and counsel explains in the argument portion of his brief why there is nothing in the record that would arguably support an appeal. Livingston was provided with a copy of his counsel’s brief and motion and informed of his right to file pro se points, but he has not done so. Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 15 The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error but whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. See Wright v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 300, at 1–2; Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904 (1994). From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with Rule 4-3(k) and conclude that there is no merit to an appeal. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. GLOVER and BROWN, JJ., agree. N. Mark Kappenbach, for appellant. No response. 2