Wells v. State

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAMES E. WELLS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-5618 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 20, 2017. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; James A. Yancey, Judge. James E. Wells, pro se. PER CURIAM. James E. Wells appeals the order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(2). We reverse and remand for resentencing pursuant to the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040, 1050 (Fla. 2016). In Atwell, the supreme court concluded that Florida's existing parole system does not provide the individualized sentencing consideration required by Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), for a juvenile offender sentenced to life imprisonment with parole eligibility after twenty-five years. Id.; see also Hixon v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2594 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 18, 2016); Landy v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2555 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 16, 2016); Michel v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2525 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 9, 2016). On remand, Mr. Wells is entitled to resentencing pursuant to sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes. Reversed and remanded. CASANUEVA, WALLACE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.               -2-