Presidential Appointment of Justice Robert Jackson to
Prosecute Axis War Criminals in Europe
The President may appoint Justice Jackson as United States prosecutor of the Axis war criminals in
Europe.
July 2, 1946
LETTER FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
I want to thank you for calling to my attention the criticisms which have been
made in your region concerning the President’s action in appointing Mr. Justice
Jackson as United States prosecutor of the Axis war criminals in Europe.
As I told you on the telephone, I think such criticism is entirely unjustified.
I hope the enclosed memorandum, giving the facts about the appointment, will
be of use to you. I don’t think my name or that of the Department should be
mentioned at the present time in this connection. However, if you should wish a
formal statement from me later on, please let me know.
TOM C. CLARK
Attorney General
460
Presidential Appointment of Justice Jackson to Prosecute Axis War Criminals
MEMORANDUM
Appointment of Mr. Justice Jackson as Representative and
Chief of Counsel of the United States in the Prosecution of
the Axis War Criminals in Europe
By Executive Order 9547 of May 2, 1945, 10 Fed. Reg. 4961, President Tru-
man designated Robert H. Jackson, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the
United States, to act as the representative of the United States and as its Chief of
Counsel in preparing and prosecuting charges of atrocities and war crimes against
such of the leaders of the European Axis powers and their principal agents and
accessories as the United States might agree with any of the United Nations to
bring to trial before an International Military Tribunal. The appointment carried
with it no additional compensation.
This appointment was made pursuant to the agreement entered into on August
8, 1945, by the United States, Great Britain, Russia, and France for the prosecution
and punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis. 59 Stat. 1544,
82 U.N.T.S. 280. The Charter of the International Military Tribunal annexed to
and made a part of that agreement provides (art. 14) that each signatory power
shall appoint a Chief Prosecutor for the investigation of the charges against and
the prosecution of major war criminals, and that the Chief Prosecutors shall act as
a committee for the following purposes:
(a) to agree upon a plan of the individual work of each of the Chief
Prosecutors and his staff,
(b) to settle the final designation of major war criminals to be tried
by the Tribunal,
(c) to approve the Indictment and the documents to be submitted
therewith,
(d) to lodge the Indictment and the accompanying documents with
the Tribunal,
(e) to draw up and recommend to the Tribunal for its approval draft
rules of procedure, contemplated by Article 13 of this Charter.
59 Stat. 1546, 1549, 82 U.N.T.S. 284, 292.
The Charter also provides (art. 15) that the Chief Prosecutors shall individually,
and acting in collaboration with one another, perform the following duties:
(a) investigation, collection and production before or at the Trial of
all necessary evidence,
461
Supplemental Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel in Volume 1
(b) the preparation of the Indictment for approval by the Committee
in accordance with paragraph (c) of Article 14 hereof,
(c) the preliminary examination of all necessary witnesses and of the
Defendants,
(d) to act as prosecutor at the Trial,
(e) to appoint representatives to carry out such duties as may be as-
signed to them,
(f) to undertake such other matters as may appear necessary to them
for the purposes of the preparation for and conduct of the Trial.
59 Stat. at 1549, 82 U.N.T.S. at 292–93.
It is hardly necessary to call attention to the fact that the undertaking in-
volved—the indictment, prosecution, and trial of the chief war criminals in
Europe—is of supreme importance to the whole civilized world. Nor is it neces-
sary to point out that this grave undertaking is unique in the history of judicial
procedure.
It was, therefore, of the utmost importance that the Chief of Counsel for the
United States be an exceedingly able man, of wide experience, of exceptional
physical vigor, of peculiar aptitude for the task, and of great legal attainments. It
was equally important that the President of the United States should be entirely
free to select that citizen of the United States who he felt was best qualified to
perform the duties of this office.
It must be conceded that Mr. Justice Jackson is eminently qualified to discharge
the duties and responsibilities of the task assigned him. His record of accomplish-
ment as Chief Prosecutor for the United States in the trial of war criminals now
being conducted at Nuremburg speaks for itself. His record in this respect is, in
fact, a complete justification of his appointment.
The appointment of Justice Jackson for this special mission is not only without
legal objection, but it is also supported by ample precedent. It is a well-established
practice for the President to secure the services of federal judges in connection
with important national and international matters. This practice arose long ago. It
is well illustrated by the following examples: Chief Justice Jay served as special
envoy to England at the request of the President. Chief Justice Ellsworth served as
special envoy to France. Chief Justice Fuller twice acted as an arbitrator of
international disputes. Circuit Judge Putnam served as a commissioner under a
conference with Great Britain relating to the seizure of vessels in the Bering Sea.
More recently, Justice Roberts served as chairman of the board appointed by
President Roosevelt to investigate the Pearl Harbor disaster of December 7, 1941.
462