KEN PAXTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
May 23, 2016
Ms. Christina Moreno Opinion No. KP-0091
Bandera County Auditor
Post Office Box 563 Re: Whether article III, section 52 of the
Bandera, Texas 78003 Texas Constitution prohibits a county from
providing financial assistance to a nonprofit
organization (RQ-0079-KP)
Dear Ms. Moreno:
You ask whether a county may "enter into an agreement with Boys and Girls Club without
violating Article III, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution." 1 You explain that the Boys and Girls
Clubs of Bandera County have "requested financial assistance," and you question whether the
county has statutory authority to provide such funding. Request Letter at 2.
Article III, subsection 52(a) of the Texas Constitution provides:
Except as otherwise provided by this section, the Legislature shall
have no power to authorize any county, city, town or other political
corporation or subdivision of the State to lend its credit or to grant
public money or thing of value in aid of, or to any individual,
association or corporation whatsoever ....
TEX. CONST. art. III, § 52(a). The purpose of this provision is "to prevent the gratuitous grant of
[public] funds to any individual, corporation, or purpose whatsoever." Byrd v. City of Dallas, 6
S.W.2d 738, 740 (Tex. 1928). Spending public funds for a legitimate public purpose to obtain a
clear public benefit, however, is not an· unconstitutional grant of public funds. See Edgewood
Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Meno, 917 S.W.2d 717, 740 (Tex. 1995). Furthermore, an expenditure to
directly accomplish a legitimate public purpose is constitutional even though it incidentally
benefits a private interest See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0078 (2003) at 5 (concluding that the
incidental benefit to private attorneys would not render the provision of online legal research
services at a county law library unconstitutional).
The Texas Supreme Court has articulated a three-part test to determine whether a transfer
of funds from a public entity to a private entity satisfies the limitations of article III, subsection
1Letter from Ms. Christina Moreno, Bandera Cty. Auditor, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen.
(Nov. 24, 2015), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinions-rqs ("Request Letter").
Ms. Christina Moreno - Page 2 (KP-0091)
52(a). See Tex. Mun. League Intergov 'ti Risk Pool v. Tex. Workers' Comp. Comm 'n, 74 S.W.3d
377, 384 (Tex. 2002). The entity making the transfer must (1) ensure that the transfer is to
"accomplish a public purpose, not to benefit private parties; (2) retain public control over the funds
to ensure that the public purpose is accomplished and to protect the public's investment; and
(3) ensure that the political subdivision receives a return benefit." Id.
Related to the first prong, which requires that the monetary transfer serve a public purpose,
you ask whether a specific statute "would allow Bandera County to fund Boys and Girls Club of
Bandera County." Request Letter at 2. A prior opinion of this office addressed a county's
provision of funding to specific nonprofit corporations that provided various services to residents
of the county. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0439 (2001). That opinion addressed, among other
things, whether a county could provide $3,000 to Big Brothers and Sisters in exchange for the
services that it provided to children from single-parent families in the county. Id. at 4. The opinion
noted that section 264.006 of the Family Code expressly empowers a county commissioners court
to "provide for services to and support of children in need of protection and care." TEX. FAM.
CODE § 264.006; see Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0439 (2001) at 5. This office concluded that
"section 264.006 authorizes the County to transfer funds to ... Big Brothers and Sisters" to the
extent that the organization provides services to and support for children who need protection and
care. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0439 (2001) at 5.
Attached to your request, you provide a document from the Boys and Girls Clubs of
Bandera County that describes some of the services they provide, including, among others, after-
school programs for grade-school children to obtain homework assistance and supervision. 2 Under
particular facts, the provision of after-school care for children from low-income families could be
a statutorily-authorized service for children in need of protection and care. Fact finding is beyond
the scope of an attorney general opinion, and we therefore are unable to determine whether, in fact,
an organization is providing the services authorized by a particular statute. See Tex. Att'y Gen.
Op. No. GA-0106 (2003) at 7 ("This office cannot find facts or resolve fact questions in an attorney
general opinion."). However, to the extent that the Boys and Girls Clubs of Bandera County
provide services and support to children in the county in need of protection and care, section
264.006 of the Family Code could serve as authority for Bandera County to provide financial
assistance to the organizations in furtherance of a statutory public purpose of the county, so long
as the additional constitutional requirements are met.
In addition to serving a public purpose, a county transferring public funds to a private entity
must retain public control over the funds to ensure that the public purpose is accomplished and to
protect the public's investment. See Tex. Mun. League Intergov 'ti Risk Pool, 74 S.W.3d at 384.
Depending on the specific transfer of funds at issue, a contractual agreement outlining
requirements that the receiving entity must comply with in exchange for the funds may provide
sufficient control over the funds. See Key v. Comm 'rs Ct. of Marion Cty., 727 S.W.2d 667, 669
(Tex. App.-Texarkana 1987, no writ) (noting that the transfer at issue did not involve a
contractual agreement for services to retain formal control). A county transferring public funds to
2See generally Request Letter attachment from Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera Cty. (on file with the Op.
Comm.).
Ms. Christina Moreno - Page 3 (KP-0091)
a private entity must also ensure that the county receives a return benefit. See Tex. Mun. League
Intergov 'ti Risk Pool, 74 S.W.3d at 384. The return benefit received by the county need not be
monetary, but could instead be the accomplishment of a county's public purpose. See Tex. Att'y
Gen. Op. No. GA-0076 (2003) at 7. The determination of whether a particular expenditure satisfies
the three-part test is for the commissioners court to make in the first instance, subject to judicial
review for an abuse of discretion. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0843 (2011) at 2; see also Comm 'rs
Ct. ofTitus Cty. v. Agan, 940 S.W.2d 77, 80 (Tex. 1997) (recognizing a district court's supervisory
control over a commissioners court that abuses its discretion).
Ms. Christina Moreno - Page 4 (KP-0091)
SUMMARY
A county entering into an agreement with Boys and Girls
Clubs to provide the organizations funding will not violate article
III, subsection 52(a) of the Texas Constitution as long as the county
(1) ensures that the transfer is to accomplish a public purpose of the
county, not to benefit private parties; (2) retains public control over
the funds to ensure that the public purpose is accomplished and to
protect the public's investment; and (3) ensures that the county
receives a return benefit.
To the extent that the Boys and Girls Clubs of Bandera
County provide services and support to children in need of
protection and care, section 264.006 of the Family Code authorizes
Bandera County to provide financial assistance to the organizations
in furtherance of a statutory public purpose of the county, so long as
the other constitutional requirements are met.
Very truly yours,
~?~
KEN PAXTON
Attorney General of Texas
JEFFREY C. MATEER
First Assistant Attorney General
BRANTLEY STARR
Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion