FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 15 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10149
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
3:15-cr-08033-DGC-1
v.
MARIO ROBLES, Jr., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 10, 2017**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Mario Robles, Jr. appeals from the appeals from the district court’s judgment
and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 137-month sentence for voluntary
manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1152 and 1112. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Robles’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Robles the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Robles has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because
the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we
dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.
2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2